Cited by 38Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

The Role of Basal Insulin and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonists in the Therapeutic Management of Type 2 Diabetes—A Comprehensive Review

Garg, Satish K.·2010·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

The treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been revolutionized by the introduction of novel therapeutic regimens following the clinical approval of the long-acting basal insulin glargine 10 years ago, followed by insulin detemir and, more recently, agents that target the glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 system with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4)-resistant products, such as liraglutide and exenatide, and DPP-4 inhibitors, such as sitagliptin, saxagliptin, alogliptin, and vildagliptin. The position and clinical efficacy of the GLP-1 mimetics are less well understood, however, and how they should be best used in the context of the established clinical efficacy of long-acting insulin analogs is yet to be defined. The aim of this review is to provide a summary of the efficacy, safety, and weight changes associated with long-acting insulin analogs (insulin glargine and insulin detemir) and two GLP-1 mimetics (exenatide and liraglutide). MEDLINE, EMBASE, and BIOSIS databases were searched with a timeframe of January 1, 2003-January 12, 2009 using the following terms: "Insulin glargine," with the co-indexing terms "LANTUS" and "HOE901"; "Insulin detemir," with the co-indexing term "Levemir"; "Exenatide"; and "Liraglutide." This literature review demonstrates that GLP-1 and basal insulin therapies are effective treatment options for insulin-naïve patients with suboptimal glycemic control with oral hypoglycemic agents. There are potential advantages of basal insulin and GLP-1 th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dia.2009.0127

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garg, S. K.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Denver (US)
Corresponding author
Garg, Satish K.
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2010-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
11-24
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W1976216395
Cited by
38
References
15
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, basal insulin, long-acting insulin analogues, insulin glargine, insulin detemir, GLP-1 receptor agonists, exenatide, liraglutide, DPP-4 inhibitors, glycemic control, weight change, insulin-naive patients, comparative efficacy and safety
MeSH terms
Insulin Glargine, Insulin Detemir, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin, Isophane, Insulin, Long-Acting, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review