The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recommendations for Standardizing Glucose Reporting and Analysis to Optimize Clinical Decision Making in Diabetes: The Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP)
Abstract
Abstract Underutilization of glucose data and lack of easy and standardized glucose data collection, analysis, visualization, and guided clinical decision making are key contributors to poor glycemic control among individuals with type 1 diabetes. An expert panel of diabetes specialists, facilitated by the International Diabetes Center and sponsored by the Helmsley Charitable Trust, met in 2012 to discuss recommendations for standardization of analysis and presentation of glucose monitoring data, with the initial focus on data derived from CGM systems. The panel members were introduced to a universal software report, the Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP), and asked to provide feedback on its content and functionality, both as a research tool and in clinical settings. This paper provides a summary of the topics and issues discussed during the meeting and presents recommendations from the expert panel regarding the need to standardize glucose profile summary metrics and the value of a uniform glucose report to aid clinicians, researchers, and patients.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Originally created by Mazze et. al. (68), the standardized AGP report was further developed by the International Diabetes Center and now incorporates all the core CGM metrics and targets along with a 14-day composite glucose profile as an integral component of clinical decision making (24).”
From Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range (2019) · cites this paper as [24]
In the citing paper
“The key benefits of CGM include real-time data monitoring for people with T1D and access for them and their HCPs to complete glucose datasets17; both of which help people to achieve their target time spent within the acceptable range (time in range [TIR]: 3.9–10.0 mmol/L [70–180 mg/dL]) and avoid hyper- and hypoglycemia.18”
From Increased Time in Range and Fewer Missed Bolus Injections After Introduction of a Smart Connected Insulin Pen (2020) · cites this paper as [18]
Citations
Cites
The Triple Aim: Care, Health, And Cost
Berwick, D. M., Nolan, T. W., & Whittington, J. (2008) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.759 · Cited by 5,136
Standards of medical care in diabetes—2013
American Diabetes Association (2013) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc13-s011 · Cited by 4,369
Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes
Gæde, P., Lund-Andersen, H., Parving, H.-H., & Pedersen, O. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0706245 · Cited by 3,465 · cited 1×
“37”
Monnier, L., Mas, E., Ginet, C., Michel, F., Villon, L., Cristol, J.-P., & Colette, C. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.14.1681 · Cited by 2,444
Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values
Nathan, D. M., Kuenen, J., Borg, R., Zheng, H., Schoenfeld, D., Heine, R. J., & for the A1c-Derived Average Glucose (ADAG) Study Group (2008) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc08-0545 · Cited by 1,812
Severe hypoglycemia and risks of vascular events and death
Zoungas, S., Patel, A., Chalmers, J., de Galan, B. E., Li, Q., Billot, L., Woodward, M., Ninomiya, T., Neal, B., MacMahon, S., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1003795 · Cited by 1,471
Defining and Reporting Hypoglycemia in Diabetes
American Diabetes Association Workgroup on Hypoglycemia (2005) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.28.5.1245 · Cited by 1,146
Hypoglycaemia: the limiting factor in the glycaemic management of type I and type II diabetes.
Cryer, P. (2002) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-002-0822-9 · Cited by 794
Wild, D., von Maltzahn, R., Brohan, E., Christensen, T., Clauson, P., & Gonder-Frederick, L. (2007) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.003 · Cited by 545
Pickup, J. C., Freeman, S. C., & Sutton, A. J. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d3805 · Cited by 541
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- McGill J.B, , Chen V, , Beck RW. Diabetes management among adults under excellent control in the Type 1 Diabetes Exchange Clinic Registry: how do they do it? Oral presentation #186 at the European Association for the Study of Diabetes Meeting, Berlin, 2012.
- Self-monitoring of blood glucose among adults with diabetes—United States, 1997–2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 2007; 56:1133–1137.
- Adi S, , Beck RW, , DuBose SN, , Bode BW, , Peters AL, , Hirsch IB, , Miller KM. T1D Exchange Clinic Network: A comparison of users, nonusers of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in the T1D Exchange. Poster presentation at the Diabetes Technology Society Meeting, October 27–292011.
- Dunn TC, , Crouther N. Assessment of the variance of the Ambulatory Glucose Profile over 3–20 days of continuous glucose monitoring. Abstract poster presented at the European Association for the Study of Diabetes Meeting, Stockholm, September 2010.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 306
Nonlinear Models of Glucose Concentration
Georga, E. I., Fotiadis, D. I., & Tigas, S. K. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804831-3.00006-6 · Cited by 5
Pardo, S. A., Shaginian, R. M., & Simmons, D. A. (2018) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296818762509 · Cited by 5
Torres, L. C., & Romero, C. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.16523 · Cited by 5
Glycemic Key Metrics and the Risk of Diabetes-Associated Complications
Kohnert, K., Heinke, P., Zander, E., Vogt, L., & Salzsieder, E. (2016) · Romanian Journal of Diabetes Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases · doi:10.1515/rjdnmd-2016-0047 · Cited by 5
“For practical reasons, an expert panel of diabetes specialists [40] recommended two of the known metrics: SD (standard deviation) around the mean glucose (SD) and interquartile range (IQR).”
BackgroundMethodChen, Y., Kao, S. L., Tan, M. L. S., Ning, Y., Salloway, M. K., Wee, H. L., Venkataraman, K., Khoo, E. Y. H., Chow, Y. L., Tai, E. S., et al. (2018) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.09.006 · Cited by 5
Maset, L. G., González, L. B., Furquet, G. L., Suay, F. M., & Marco, R. H. (2016) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2016.0208 · Cited by 5
It's Time for a Standard Glucose Report from CGM
KAUFMAN, F. R. (2013) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2013.0061 · Cited by 5
Igbe, T., & Kovatchev, B. P. (2025) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/19322968251323913 · Cited by 4
“10,11 Further splitting is done to the glucose 70 mg/dL range to create 55 to 70 mg/dL and glucose 55 mg/dL ranges, which are considered for estimating the severity of hypoglycemia in the AGP report.”
Standardization of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Reporting
Garg, S. K. (2013) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2013.0055 · Cited by 4
Accounting for Hypoglycemia Treatments in Continuous Glucose Metrics
Pryor, E. C., Fathi, A. E., & Breton, M. D. (2025) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/19322968251329952 · Cited by 4
Hanaire, H. P., Atlan, C., Benhamou, P., Bismuth, É., Bonnemaison, É., Borot, S., Catargi, B., Charpentier, G., Farret, A., Filhol, N., et al. (2017) · Médecine des Maladies Métaboliques · doi:10.1016/s1957-2557(18)30030-0 · Cited by 5
Hohendorff, J., Czupryniak, L., Dzida, G. J., Fichna, P., Jarosz-Chobot, P. A., Klupa, T., Myśliwiec, M., Szadkowska, A., Zozulińska‐Ziółkiewicz, D., & Malecki, M. T. (2021) · Archives of Medical Science · doi:10.5114/aoms/139025 · Cited by 5
Siemens, R. L. (2022) · Clinical Diabetes · doi:10.2337/cd21-0088 · Cited by 4
Courtney, A., Smith, D., & Forde, H. E. (2023) · Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) · doi:10.1007/s11845-023-03322-9 · Cited by 4
“Standardisation of CGM data presentation in the form of the Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) has been developed to assist clinicians and people with diabetes identify glucose patterns to guide clinical decision-making [11].”
MethodNeue Klassifikation des Diabetes mellitus – Anforderungen an Labormessgrößen
Hörber, S., Kaiser, P., Achenbach, P., Schleicher, E. D., & Peter, A. (2020) · Diabetologie und Stoffwechsel · doi:10.1055/a-1320-2574 · Cited by 4
“[12] Bergenstal RM, Ahmann AJ, Bailey T et al.”
BackgroundThomas, A., Haak, T., Tombek, A., Kulzer, B., Ehrmann, D., Kordonouri, O., Kroeger, J., Schubert-Olesen, O., Kolassa, R., Siegmund, T., et al. (2022) · Diabetologie und Stoffwechsel · doi:10.1055/a-1849-2137 · Cited by 4
“[10] Bergenstal RM, Ahmann AJ, Bailey T et al.”
BackgroundNaqvi, R., & Naqvi, A. (2023) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.01.24.525444 · Cited by 3
Agha, A. E. A. (2015) · Journal of Diabetes & Metabolism · doi:10.4172/2155-6156.1000548 · Cited by 3
“The relation between performing SMBG and glycemic control in diabetes is widely discussed in literature, with numerous studies reporting an inverse relationship between the frequency of SMBG per day and the levels of glycated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) as the measure for glycemic control [1,3-8,10].”
BackgroundDefinition and Clinical Significance of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Parameters
Mo, Y., & Jia, W. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-7074-7_6 · Cited by 3
Pedone, E., Laurenzi, A., Allora, A., Bolla, A. M., & Caretto, A. (2020) · Exploration of Medicine · doi:10.37349/emed.2020.00021 · Cited by 3
“In this view, a complete picture of glucose trends and patterns can be provided by the AGP report offered by several systems of glucose monitoring [45].”
Irsheed, G. A., Steffen, A. D., Martyn-Nemeth, P. A., Park, M., Quinn, L., Duffecy, J. L., Baron, K. G., Saleh, A. H., Takgbajouah, M., Bimbi, O., et al. (2025) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaf032 · Cited by 5
Rodríguez, J., Camiña, F., Devesa, J. B. O., Rodríguez‐Segade, S., & Rodríguez, Á. (2025) · Advances in Laboratory Medicine / Avances en Medicina de Laboratorio · doi:10.1515/almed-2025-0011 · Cited by 15
“In the recent years, CGM measures, including glycemic variability and time in range, have been integrated into routine clinical practice [3].”
InfluentialAntsiferov, M. B., Galstyan, G. R., Zilov, A. V., Mayorov, A. Y., Markova, T. N., Demidov, N. A. D., Koteshkova, O. M. K., Лаптев, Д. Н., Vitebskaya, A. V., Alekseeva, Y. G., et al. (2019) · Problems of Endocrinology · doi:10.14341/probl10197 · Cited by 3
Sifri, S. A., Alshaikh, A., Bin-Abbas, B. S., Sheshah, E., Sabaan, F. S. A., Aldawish, M., Al-Dubayee, M., Alzaman, N. S., Aldahash, R., ALZAHRANI, S. H., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.4236/ijcm.2021.128028 · Cited by 3
New technical approach to the diabetes therapy
Dovč, K., & Battelino, T. (2020) · Minerva Pediatrics · doi:10.23736/s0026-4946.20.05865-x · Cited by 3
Multiplicative Standard Deviation for Blood Glucose
Braithwaite, S. S. (2013) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2013.0295 · Cited by 3
Cowart, K., White, R. T., Olson, K., Carris, N. W., Hanna, K., & Zgibor, J. C. (2025) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/67014 · Cited by 3
“HbA 1c is an average of glycemia over 2-3 months, with variability in the average glucose range at any HbA 1c level [4].”
InfluentialEhlert, B., Aron, D., Perelman, D., Wu, Y., & Snyder, M. P. (2025) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1177/15209156251374711 · Cited by 4
“Additionally, most CGM portals from device manufacturers often do not support plots other than time-series and AGP 13,21,22 or calculate GV metrics such as the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGEs).”
Flash Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Practical Guide and Call to Action for Pharmacists
Cowart, K., & Zgibor, J. C. (2021) · Journal of Pharmacy Practice · doi:10.1177/08971900211000273 · Cited by 4
“Moreover, patients with similar HbA1c levels can have dissimilar trends in glucose.(23) HbA1c is also unreliable under many hematologic conditions (i.”
BackgroundMaines, E., Pertile, R., Cauvin, V., Soffiati, M., & Franceschi, R. (2024) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111720 · Cited by 2
Medina, A. M. G., Carrillo, D. C. H., Ré, M., Faradji, R. N., Flores‐Caloca, Ó., la Garza-Hernández, N. E. D., Ferreira, C. A., Garnica-Cuéllar, J. C., Krakauer, M., & Galindo, R. J. (2024) · Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome · doi:10.1186/s13098-024-01362-4 · Cited by 2
“Ambulatory use of fCGM systems have demonstrated improvements in glucose management and patient satisfaction, reduced fear of hypoglycemia, improved quality of life, and reduction of diabetic emergency hospitalizations [14].”
BackgroundInfluentialMonzon, A. D., Cushing, C. C., Clements, M. A., & Patton, S. R. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings · doi:10.1007/s10880-021-09838-5 · Cited by 3
Mahmoudi, Z., Johansen, M. D., Nørgaard, H. H., Andersen, S., Pedersen‐Bjergaard, U., Tarnow, L., Christiansen, J. S., & Hejlesen, O. K. (2015) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296815587935 · Cited by 2
“One of the reasons could be rooted in the fact that clinicians usually follow a subjective methodology— being established during years of experience—to interpret the information provided by CGM.47,48 Subjective CGM interpretation can further result in inconsistent and unrepeatable treatment advice between and within c…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPathophysiology and Management of Type 1 Diabetes
Georga, E. I., Fotiadis, D. I., & Tigas, S. K. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804831-3.00002-9 · Cited by 2
Comparative- and cost-effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring for Type 1 diabetes
McQueen, R. B. (2013) · doi:10.25677/5jzc-na10 · Cited by 2
Girsh, Y. V., Kiyaev, A. V., Slovak, M. A., Korneva, I. V., Промин, И. А., Yusupova, N. A., & Savelyev, L. I. (2022) · Diabetes Mellitus · doi:10.14341/dm12838 · Cited by 1
Diabetic ketoacidosis due to a sensor defect of FreeStyle Libre: A case report
Kogai, T., Sato, J., Hirakata, M., Iwamoto, T., Nakajima, K., Goto, H., Nishida, Y., & Watada, H. (2023) · Journal of Diabetes Investigation · doi:10.1111/jdi.14065 · Cited by 1
Rodríguez, Á., Rodríguez, J., Camiña, F., Devesa, J. B. O., & Rodríguez‐Segade, S. (2025) · Advances in Laboratory Medicine / Avances en Medicina de Laboratorio · doi:10.1515/almed-2024-0125 · Cited by 1
CRANSTON, I. C., & Nicholson, E. (2014) · Practical Diabetes · doi:10.1002/pdi.1850 · Cited by 1
¿De qué nos sirve evaluar las tendencias del perfil glucémico ambulatorio?
Izquierdo, E. S. (2014) · Avances en Diabetología · doi:10.1016/j.avdiab.2014.06.002 · Cited by 1
Random Plasma Glucose Levels and Cardiovascular Risk
Yan, L. L., Jiang, H., & Lam, C. S. P. (2016) · JAMA Cardiology · doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2016.1802 · Cited by 1
mHealth Environments for Chronic Disease Management
Georga, E. I., Papadopoulos, A. N., & Fotiadis, D. I. (2015) · Advances in medical diagnosis, treatment, and care (AMDTC) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8828-5.ch024 · Cited by 1
Proinsulin Promotes Self-Renewal of a Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Line In Vitro
Han, Y., Liu, T., Zou, Y., Ji, L., Li, Y., Li, J., Wang, J., Chen, G., Chen, J., Chen, L., et al. (2017) · Journal of Diabetes Research · doi:10.1155/2017/5649191 · Cited by 1
“Diabetes mellitus, a widespread metabolic disorder, is a global epidemic with a continuous, steep increase in global prevalence and incidence [1].”
Clinical Applications of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Reports and Management Systems
Zhang, L., & Jia, W. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-7074-7_8 · Cited by 1
Should all patients on insulin be using continuous glucose monitoring?
Distiller, L. A. (2018) · Journal of Endocrinology Metabolism and Diabetes of South Africa · doi:10.1080/16089677.2018.1515164 · Cited by 1
Lensing, C. J., Garth, S. R., Ehlert, B., Duerr, J. M., Wagner, C. D., Kapov, K. A., Jones, J. P., & Hoversten, S. (2019) · Diabetes Spectrum · doi:10.2337/ds19-0005 · Cited by 1
“We have found one type of CGM report of particular interest: the International Diabetes Center (IDC)’s Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) (Figure 2) (18), which has been endorsed by panels of diabetes care experts (19,20).”
BackgroundPatton, S. R., Fox, L. A., Cushing, C. C., McDonough, R., & Clements, M. A. (2022) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2022.107008 · Cited by 1
Personal and Lifestyle Determinants of Glycemic Variability in Healthy Adults Without Diabetes
Park, D., Jo, G., Oh, H., & Shin, M. (2024) · CardioMetabolic Syndrome Journal · doi:10.51789/cmsj.2024.4.e15 · Cited by 1
GluMarker: A Novel Predictive Modeling of Glycemic Control Through Digital Biomarkers
Zhou, Z., Cheng, M., Diao, X., Cui, Y., & Li, X. (2024) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc53108.2024.10782165 · Cited by 1
“Afterward, the digital biomarkers are then combined with original records as the model input for glycemic control prediction.”
Status of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology in Clinical Practice
O’Connor, C., & Aleppo, G. (2019) · doi:10.2337/9781580406932.part1_ch04 · Cited by 1
Empowering Self-Management of Diabetes through Long-Term Wearable Data and Seasonal Visualizations
Cui, Y., Wagle, B. R., Raj, S., Plaitano, E. G., Stanger, C., & Prioleau, T. (2025) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3706599.3719780 · Cited by 2
“Leveraging insights from these studies, we quantified variations in diabetes management using the clinically-validated metric called time in range (TIR) [9, 15].”
¿Qué podemos esperar del control de la variabilidad glucémica?
Gómez, M. D. (2014) · Avances en Diabetología · doi:10.1016/j.avdiab.2014.03.001 · Cited by 1
Argento, N. B. (2018) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/dme.13654 · Cited by 1
Navigating the wheel of glucose control: where are we now?
Bhattacharya, S. (2019) · Endocrinology&Metabolism International Journal · doi:10.15406/emij.2019.07.00234 · Cited by 1
Faiola, A. J., Vatani, H., & Agarwal, M. (2019) · ICST Transactions on Ambient Systems · doi:10.4108/eai.23-3-2018.162220 · Cited by 1
“, BG levels of <70 mg/dL) [4] and can cause short-term complications including unconsciousness or permanent brain damage.”
BackgroundGómez, A. M., Henao, D. C., Imitola, A., Múñoz, Ó., Rondón, M., Kattah, L., Guerrero, J. S., Morros, E., Llano, J. P., Jaramillo, M. G., et al. (2018) · Endocrinología Diabetes y Nutrición (English ed ) · doi:10.1016/j.endien.2018.03.015 · Cited by 1
Safety and Performance of Continuous Glucose Monitoring: An Overview
Venkatesan, V., & Singh, H. (2022) · Current Diabetes Reviews · doi:10.2174/1573399818666220525111746 · Cited by 1
Glycemic Variability and Ambulatory Glucose Profile in Indian Diabetics.
Joshi, S. (2016) · PubMed · Cited by 1
Zhang, Y., Bartolomeo, S. D., Sheng, F., & Dunne, C. (2019) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/q764s · Cited by 1
Kim, M. Y., Kim, G., Park, J. Y., Choi, M. S., Jun, J. E., Lee, Y., Jin, S., Hur, K. Y., & Kim, J. H. (2020) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-101449/v1 · Cited by 1
Gruener, M.-R., West, E., Muhitira, U., Heldt, K., Oberhauser, S. S., l’Allemand, D., Jovanova, M., Kowatsch, T., & Broser, P. J. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.03.25.25324553 · Cited by 1
“While straightforward to calculate and widely used in clinical practice (27), SD treats all deviations equally, regardless of their order, clinical significance, or their relationship to target glucose levels.”
Leinung, M. C. (2014) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep14112.co
Contreras, I., & Vehı́, J. (2015) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.10.170
9th Annual Symposium on Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose, April 28–30, 2016, Madrid, Spain
Parkin, C. G., Homberg, A., & Hinzmann, R. (2016) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2016.0336
Benhamou, P. (2016) · Médecine des Maladies Métaboliques · doi:10.1016/s1957-2557(16)30157-2
Glycemic control for prevention vascular complication in diabetic patient
Pusparini, P. (2017) · Universa Medicina · doi:10.18051/univmed.2017.v36.77-79
Linear Time Series Models of Glucose Concentration
Georga, E. I., Fotiadis, D. I., & Tigas, S. K. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804831-3.00005-4
An mhealth Platform to Evaluate Glycaemic Variability in Type 1 Diabetes
Gogolos, G. I., Georga, E. I., Rizos, E. C., & Fotiadis, D. I. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE) · doi:10.1109/bibe.2017.00-42
“Recommendations for standardization of analysis and report of blood glucose data including measures for GV and glucose exposure (GE) have been introduced in the Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) [3].”
BackgroundMethodInfluential11th Annual Symposium on Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose: April 12–14, 2018, Oslo, Norway
Parkin, C. G., Homberg, A., & Hinzmann, R. (2018) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2018.0284
Terada, T. (2014) · ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta) · doi:10.7939/r30m4k
Sonnet, E. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98119-2_8
CGM-Parameter für das Diabetesmanagement – ein Update
Siegmund, T., Kolassa, R., & Thomas, A. (2019) · Diabetes aktuell · doi:10.1055/a-0918-0483
Digitalisierung im Therapiealltag: Softwarelösungen für das kontinuierliche Glukosemonitoring
Thomas, A., & Sahm, C. (2020) · Diabetes aktuell · doi:10.1055/a-1284-4415
“Eine ebenfalls in den internationalen Konsensus‑Statements vorgeschlagene Darstellung ist das ambulante Glukoseprofil (AGP), ursprünglich entwickelt für die stan‑ dardisierte Aufbereitung und Auswertung von SMBG‑Daten [13], nun erweitert für CGM‑Kurven [14] (▶Abb.”
BackgroundInfluentialMcCarthy, O. M., Deere, R., Eckstein, M. L., Pitt, J. P., Wellman, B., Bain, S. C., Moser, O., & Bracken, R. M. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.568832
Flash Glucose Monitoring(FGM)時代の血糖値の分類 ―低血糖・血糖値スパイクを中心に―
勝太郎, 永., 悟子, 志., 大槻, 千., & 喜山, 克. (2021) · doi:10.32183/ifcm.19.1_21
(2021) · Diabetes aktuell · doi:10.1055/a-1627-4413
mHealth Environments for Chronic Disease Management
Georga, E. I., Papadopoulos, A. N., & Fotiadis, D. I. (2017) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2237-9.ch038
mHealth Environments for Chronic Disease Management
Georga, E. I., Papadopoulos, A. N., & Fotiadis, D. I. (2018) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-6915-2.ch030
Ambulantes Glukoseprofil (AGP) und relevante Daten aus CGM-Messungen
Kröger, J., & Thomas, A. (2022) · Diabetes aktuell · doi:10.1055/a-1779-2222
Diabetes Technology for Precision Therapy in Children, Adults, and Pregnancy
Mazze, R. S., Kong, A. P. S., Petrovski, G., & Basu, R. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-98927-9_14 · Cited by 1
„Time in range“ (TIR) vs. Glykohämoglobin Typ A1c (HbA1c): was zählt für unsere Patienten?
Harer, C., & Mader, J. K. (2022) · Die Diabetologie · doi:10.1007/s11428-022-00963-9
Pérez-Gualdrón, C. E., Ordoñez, J. S. F., Bernal, N. B., Pacheco, A. F. P., Chaparro, N. J. M., & Cadena, J. D. C. (2023) · Revista Colombiana de Endocrinología Diabetes & Metabolismo · doi:10.53853/encr.10.2.793
“[13] Bergenstal RM, Ahmann AJ, Bailey T, Beck RW, Bissen J, Buckingham B, et al.”
BackgroundNew Technologies for Glucose Monitoring
Danne, T., & Kordonouri, O. (2024) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119697473.ch32
Treatment and prevention of type 1 diabetes in the 21st century
Baidal, D. A., Sosenko, J. M., & Skyler, J. S. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-91707-0.00007-3
Shi, J., Wang, X., Zhang, H., Ding, Y., Wu, J., Luo, S., Hu, H., & Zheng, X. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079659
“The availability of monitoring data in a simple and standardised format, such as the ambulatory glucose profile, 8–10 can facilitate their use in routine clinical practice, enhancing treatment adjustments and improving patient education.”
BackgroundYépez-Rodríguez, A. E., Garduño-Pérez, Á. A., Martínez-Abundis, E., Lavalle-González, F. J., Canto, J. A. C., Garnica-Cuéllar, J. C., Vera-Zertuche, J. M., la Garza-Hernández, N. E. D., Almeda‐Valdés, P., & Faradji, R. N. (2024) · Revista Mexicana de Endocrinología Metabolismo y Nutrición · doi:10.24875/rme.m24000032
“La HbA1c tiene va-rias limitaciones: representa solo un promedio de dos a tres meses; no detecta hipoglucemia o hiper-glucemia; es poco confiable en anemia, hemoglo-binopatías, deficiencia de hierro y embarazo; no refleja cambios rápidos y no ayuda en el ajuste de tratamiento en tiempo real 9,10 .”
Interpretation of Meters, Pumps, and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Downloads
Weaver, K., & Hirsch, I. B. (2019) · doi:10.2337/9781580406932.part1_ch08
Glycemic Goals and Assessment of Glycemia
(2022) · American Diabetes Association eBooks · doi:10.2337/9781580407700.ch02
Kobayati, A., Tsoukas, M. A., Garfield, N., Legault, L., Pasqua, M., Yale, J., Meltzer, S. J., Wing, S. S., Michaud, S., Tardio, V., et al. (2025) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-025-06627-9
“…data were presented in the platform as: (1) summaries of insulin and glucose metrics; (2) a detailed graph displaying intermittently scanned CGM data and logged meal and insulin data; and (3) an ambulatory glucose profile graph displaying trends across a 24 h period [12] (ESM Figs 2–3).”
Tokutsu, A., Okada, Y., Torimoto, K., & Tanaka, Y. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12799284
Demirbaş, M., Ergün, U., & Pamuk, B. Ö. (2026) · International Journal of Clinical Practice · doi:10.1155/ijcp/4857821
Enhancing diabetes monitoring systems’ reports: A novel integrated diabetes report (IDR)
Aldaghi, T., Bém, R., & Mužík, J. (2026) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2026.106288
Time to redefine success in continuous glucose monitoring
Albert, L., Capel, I., & Rigla, M. (2026) · Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.tem.2026.02.007
Paull, M. E. (2026) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1177/15209156261435242
“10,11 The human endocrine system operates through coupled circadian oscillators — clock genes, autonomic tone, and counter-regulatory hormone secretion — following approximately 24-h cycles without reset points.”
Gandhi, K. K., Friesner-Gephart, K., Hoffman, R. S., Okafor, M. J., Freeman, A. J., Heinzman, C., Rasmussen, S. K., Nathan, J. D., & Ladd, J. M. (2026) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.1016/j.eprac.2026.03.102
Shinde, S. N., Shinde, R. S., & Bhangaaley, S. Y. (2026) · International Journal of Diabetes and Technology · doi:10.64898/2026.05.24.26353983
Digital biomarkers in non-communicable diseases
Agha-Mir-Salim, L., Grünewald, E., Balzer, F., & Braune, K. (2026) · Biomarkers · doi:10.1080/1354750x.2026.2682425
“…in diverse populations. the standardized Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) has become a key tool for visualizing and interpreting cGM data in home, clinical and research settings, facilitating the detection of glucose patterns, variability, and time in target ranges (Bergenstal et al. 2013).”
Ashraf, T., & Lessan, N. G. (2026) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2026.113369
Barth, C.-M., Fedosov, A., Wacharamanotham, C., Bernard, J., & Huang, E. M. (2026) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3800645.3813059
Schwensfeier, L., & Brinkmann, C. K. (2026) · Sports · doi:10.3390/sports14070274
“In this context, standardized CGM outcomes and reporting frameworks have already been established, such as the “Ambulatory Glucose Profile” (AGP) [13] or the International Consensus Statement on CGM and Metrics for Clinical Trials [14].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Bergenstal, R. M., Ahmann, A. J., Bailey, T., Beck, R. W., Bissen, J., Buckingham, B., Deeb, L., Dolin, R. H., Garg, S. K., Goland, R., Hirsch, I. B., Klonoff, D. C., Kruger, D. F., Matfin, G., Mazze, R. S., Olson, B. A., Parkin, C., Peters, A., Powers, M. A., Rodriguez, H., Southerland, P., Strock, E. S., Tamborlane, W., & Wesley, D. M.
- Affiliations
- Park Nicollet Clinic (US)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Jaeb Center for Health Research (US)
- Lucile Packard Children's Hospital (US)
- Florida State University (US)
- Lantana Consulting Group
- University of Colorado Denver (US)
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Henry Ford Health (US)
- CGParkin Communications, Inc.
- University of Southern California (US)
- University of South Florida (US)
- Team Type 1, Atlanta, Georiga.
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bergenstal, Richard M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 198-211
- ISSN
- 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8593
- OpenAlex
- W2388765709
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- Abbott Diabetes Care
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- ambulatory glucose profile, continuous glucose monitoring, type 1 diabetes, glycemic control, clinical decision-making, expert panel recommendations
- MeSH terms
- Blood Glucose, Decision Making, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia, Male, Reference Standards, Software, United States, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Monitoring, Ambulatory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review