Cited by 401Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationGlobal Health Workforce IssuesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

The Application of Medical Artificial Intelligence Technology in Rural Areas of Developing Countries

Open access
Guo, Jonathan, Li, Bin·2018·Health Equity

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is a rapidly developing computer technology that has begun to be widely used in the medical field to improve the professional level and efficiency of clinical work, in addition to avoiding medical errors. In developing countries, the inequality between urban and rural health services is a serious problem, of which the shortage of qualified healthcare providers is the major cause of the unavailability and low quality of healthcare in rural areas. Some studies have shown that the application of computer-assisted or AI medical techniques could improve healthcare outcomes in rural areas of developing countries. Therefore, the development of suitable medical AI technology for rural areas is worth discussing and probing. Methods: This article reviews and discusses the literature concerning the prospects of medical AI technology, the inequity of healthcare, and the application of computer-assisted or AI medical techniques in rural areas of developing countries. Results: Medical AI technology not only could improve physicians' efficiency and quality of medical services, but other health workers could also be trained to use this technique to compensate for the lack of physicians, thereby improving the availability of healthcare access and medical service quality. This article proposes a multilevel medical AI service network, including a frontline medical AI system (basic level), regional medical AI support centers (middle levels), and a national medical AI development center (top level). Conclusion: The promotion of medical AI technology in rural areas of developing countries might be one means of alleviating the inequality between urban and rural health services. The establishment of a multilevel medical AI service network system may be a solution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/heq.2018.0037

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI is expected to augment healthcare workflow through automated triage, improve the productivity of individual physicians, reduce human errors, discover better patterns of patient care, defray medical costs, perform minimally invasive surgery, and reduce mortality rates.

    “AI is expected to augment healthcare workflow through automated triage, improve the productivity of individual physicians, reduce human errors, discover better patterns of patient care, defray medical costs, perform minimally invasive surgery, and reduce mortality rates.8–14”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [4]McCarthy J, Minsky M, Rochester N, et al. A proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on artificial intelligence, August 31, 1955. AI Magazine. 2006; 27: 12– 14
  2. [9]Shortliffe EH Computer-Based Medical Consultations: MYCIN. Artificial Intelligence Series. New York: Elsevier Computer Science Library, 1976
  3. [34]World Health Organization. Increasing access to health workers in remote and rural areas through improved retention: Global policy recommendations. 2010 Available at www.who.int/hrh/retention/guidelines/en Accessed 3 21, 2018 23741785

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, J., & Li, B.
Affiliations
  • Department of Social Medicine, Washington Institute for Health Sciences, Arlington, Virginia.
  • Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Li, Bin
Venue
Health Equity
Published
2018-08
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
174-181
ISSN
2473-1242 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2887066107
Cited by
401
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Equity (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, rural health care, developing countries, physician shortage, health care access, health professions education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review