Cited by 64Youth Development and Social SupportMentoring and Academic DevelopmentChildren's Rights and Participation

Expanding the reach of youth mentoring: Partnering with youth for personal growth and social change

Liang, Belle, Spencer, Renée, West, Jennifer, Rappaport, Nancy·2013·Journal of Adolescence

Abstract

The goals of youth mentoring have broadened from redressing youth problems to promoting positive youth development. Yet, many of the principles associated with contemporary conceptualizations of development found in the positive youth development (PYD) and community psychology (CP) literature have yet to be fully integrated into mentoring research and practice. These approaches place greater emphasis on youth as assets to their communities and the promotion of positive development through the cultivation of these assets, often by fostering collaborative partnerships between youth and adults to effect social change. In this paper, we examine how bringing these systemic, asset-oriented approaches more fully to bear on the youth mentoring process creates opportunities that may both extend the reach and deepen the impact of youth mentoring through the promotion of community, social, and individual change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.10.002

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gender-based theories pertaining to mentoring suggest that girls generally exhibit a more favorable response to mentoring because they place a greater emphasis on contact-focused goals.

    “gender-based theories pertaining to mentoring suggest that girls generally exhibit a more favorable response to mentoring because they place a greater emphasis on contact-focused goals [23,172]).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liang, B., Spencer, R., West, J., & Rappaport, N.
Affiliations
  • Boston College (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Cambridge Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Liang, Belle
Venue
Journal of Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12-23
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
257-267
ISSN
  • 0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9254
OpenAlex
W2017821198
Cited by
64
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
Keywords
youth mentoring, positive youth development, community psychology, asset-based approach, youth-adult partnerships, social change, community development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cooperative Behavior, Female, Humans, Human Development, Male, Mentors, Social Change, Social Justice, Social Responsibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review