The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Decreased Incidence of VanA-type Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Isolated from Poultry Meat and from Fecal Samples of Humans in the Community after Discontinuation of Avoparcin Usage in Animal Husbandry
Abstract
The use of the glycopeptide antibiotic avoparcin (AVO) as a feed additive in animal husbandry of many European countries led in 1994–1995 to frequent isolation of VanA-type vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) from commercially produced animal foodstuffs as well as from fecal samples of nonhospitalized persons in Germany (Saxony-Anhalt state). However, at the end of 1997, a decreasing number of such VRE was detected in frozen and fresh poultry meat (chickens and turkeys) from German producers. At this point in time, AVO had been discontinued in animal husbandry for more than 2 and one-half years in Denmark/Norway, nearly 2 years in Germany, and about 8–9 months in all countries of the European Community and Switzerland, respectively. VRE were then only detected in very low concentrations in one-quarter of the poultry meat samples (eight of 31, originating from 18 distinct German producers and bought in 12 different supermarkets). A decline of VRE prevalence was also observed in the gut flora of healthy persons (VRE carriers) in the same region (Saxony-Anhalt state, Germany), having fallen from 12% (12/100) in 1994 when AVO was being used to 6% (6/100) in 1996 and 3% (13/400) in 1997 after it was discontinued. These results likely indicate the importance of antibiotic selective pressure by glycopeptides such as AVO for the presence of VRE in animal meat products from commercial animal husbandry. Additionally, it underlines the role of animal products for the spread of resistant bacteria and transferable resistance genes to humans in the community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Food Animals and Antimicrobials: Impacts on Human Health
Marshall, B. M., & Levy, S. B. (2011) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00002-11 · Cited by 2,241
Antibiotic resistance gene spread due to manure application on agricultural fields
Heuer, H., Schmitt, H., & Smalla, K. (2011) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2011.04.009 · Cited by 985
Antimicrobial resistance in humans, livestock and the wider environment
Woolhouse, M., Ward, M., van Bunnik, B., & Farrar, J. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0083 · Cited by 678
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci: why are they here, and where do they come from?
Bonten, M. J., Willems, R., & Weinstein, R. A. (2001) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(01)00145-1 · Cited by 400
Selective pressure by antibiotic use in livestock
Witte, W. (2000) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/s0924-8579(00)00301-0 · Cited by 315
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Klare, I., BADSTÜBNER, D., Konstabel, C., BÖHME, G., Claus, H., & Witte, W.
- Venue
- Microbial Drug Resistance
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-52
- ISSN
- 1076-6294 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-8448
- OpenAlex
- W2096174565
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decreased Incidence of VanA-type Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Isolated from Poultry Meat and from Fecal Samples of Humans in the Community after Discontinuation of Avoparcin Usage in Animal Husbandry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/mdr.1999.5.45
- The paper
- Klare, I., BADSTÜBNER, D., Konstabel, C., BÖHME, G., Claus, H., & Witte, W. (1999). Decreased Incidence of VanA-type Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Isolated from Poultry Meat and from Fecal Samples of Humans in the Community after Discontinuation of Avoparcin Usage in Animal Husbandry. Microbial Drug Resistance. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.1999.5.45
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.