Cited by 120

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuronal Cell Loss in the CA3 Subfield of the Hippocampus Following Cortical Contusion Utilizing the Optical Disector Method for Cell Counting

BALDWIN, STANLEY A., GIBSON, TONYA, CALLIHAN, C. TODD, SULLIVAN, PATRICK G., PALMER, ERICK, SCHEFF, STEPHEN W.·1997·Journal of Neurotrauma

Abstract

Unilateral cortical contusion in the rat results in cell loss in both the cortex and hippocampus. Pharmacological intervention with growth factors or excitatory neurotransmitter antagonists may reduce cell loss and improve neurological outcome. The window of opportunity for such intervention remains unclear because a detailed temporal analysis of neuronal loss has not been performed in the rodent cortical contusion model. To elucidate the time course of hippocampal CA3 neuronal death ensuing cortical contusion, we employed the optical disector method for assessing the total number of CA3 neurons at 1 and 6 hours, 1, 2, 10, and 30 days following injury. This stereological technique allows reporting of total cell numbers within a given region and is unaffected by change in the volume of the structure or cell size. A rapid and significant reduction in neurons/mm3 in the ipsilateral CA3 field was observed by 1 h following trauma. However, a significant increase in neurons/mm3 was seen at 30 days postinjury. This surprising finding is a result of CA3 volume shrinkage and redistribution of CA3 neurons. Utilization of the optical disector reveals that regardless of an increase in neurons/mm3 at 30 days following injury, CA3 cell loss reaches 41% of control animals by 1 day posttrauma and remains near that level at all subsequent time points examined. It is estimated that there are about 156,000 neurons in the CA3 region in control animals. By 1 h following cortical contusion the cel…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/neu.1997.14.385

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 101

  1. 10.1002/cne.902400104 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/0306-4522(89)90424-7 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb39232.x · DOI
  4. BALDWIN S., 1995, J. Neurotrauma, 12
  5. 10.3171/jns.1996.85.3.0476 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199603)16:3<266::AID-GLIA9>3.0.CO;2-# · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1989.tb22594.x · DOI
  8. 10.1089/neu.1995.12.791 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0165-0270(86)90112-3 · DOI
  10. 10.1089/neu.1992.9.1 · DOI
  11. BRAUGHLER J.M., 1992, J. Neurotrauma, 9, S1, 10.1089/neu.1992.9.1 · DOI
  12. 10.1089/neu.1994.11.573 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/neu.480230404 · DOI
  14. 10.1126/science.1357748 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19960101)364:1<6::AID-CNE2>3.0.CO;2-9 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0006-8993(96)00819-0 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0006-8993(96)00824-4 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/hipo.450050103 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/0006-8993(89)91190-6 · DOI
  20. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-03-02030.1995 · DOI
  21. 10.1089/neu.1988.5.105 · DOI
  22. DIETRICH W., 1996, J. Neurotrauma, 13, 309, 10.1089/neu.1996.13.309 · DOI
  23. 10.3171/jns.1987.67.1.0110 · DOI
  24. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-11-03531.1990 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/0163-1047(92)90724-I · DOI · Paper page
  26. ELIAS H., 1983, A Guide to Practical Stereology. Karger: New York, 121
  27. 10.1126/science.2567056 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/0169-328X(94)00287-O · DOI
  29. 10.1089/neu.1991.8.129 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0014-4886(89)80004-4 · DOI
  31. 10.1089/neu.1994.11.587 · DOI
  32. GORMAN L., 1989, J. Neurotrauma, 6, 203
  33. 10.1016/0006-8993(93)91014-J · DOI
  34. 10.1089/neu.1994.11.135 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1987.tb02837.x · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1986.tb02764.x · DOI
  37. 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1988.tb00954.x · DOI
  38. 10.1089/neu.1992.9.11 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/0166-4328(93)90164-L · DOI
  40. 10.1016/0926-6410(93)90006-Q · DOI
  41. 10.1089/neu.1996.13.325 · DOI
  42. 10.1089/neu.1996.13.317 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/0165-0270(86)90110-X · DOI
  44. 10.1089/neu.1992.9.173 · DOI
  45. 10.1089/neu.1995.12.779 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/0006-8993(95)00179-T · DOI
  47. 10.1007/s004010050421 · DOI
  48. 10.1089/neu.1994.11.417 · DOI
  49. 10.1089/neu.1992.9.47 · DOI
  50. 10.3171/jns.1988.69.5.0736 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/0163-1047(93)90664-4 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.3171/jns.1990.73.6.0889 · DOI
  53. KEMPSKI O., 1994, Acta Neurochir. (Wien), 60, 7
  54. 10.1016/0006-8993(82)90833-2 · DOI
  55. KIRSCH J.F., 1992, J. Neurotrauma, 9, S157, 10.1089/neu.1992.9.157 · DOI
  56. 10.1089/neu.1992.9.349 · DOI
  57. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-12-04846.1992 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/0006-8993(90)91229-A · DOI
  59. 10.1089/neu.1996.13.139 · DOI
  60. MARMAROU A., 1994, Acta Neurochir. (Wien), 60, 421
  61. 10.1089/neu.1994.11.3 · DOI
  62. MAYHEW T., 1996, J. Anat., 188, 1
  63. 10.1089/neu.1989.6.247 · DOI
  64. 10.1111/j.1365-2990.1995.tb01090.x · DOI
  65. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1988.tb04603.x · DOI
  66. 10.1089/neu.1995.12.853 · DOI
  67. 10.3171/jns.1994.80.2.0301 · DOI
  68. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1990.tb00014.x · DOI
  69. 10.1073/pnas.92.21.9697 · DOI
  70. 10.3171/jns.1977.47.2.0262 · DOI
  71. 10.1017/S0140525X00063949 · DOI
  72. 10.1089/neu.1994.11.83 · DOI
  73. 10.3171/jns.1989.70.5.0774 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/0006-8993(93)90078-2 · DOI
  75. 10.1089/neu.1996.13.125 · DOI
  76. 10.1002/ana.410110509 · DOI
  77. RINK A., 1995, Am. J. Pathol., 147, 1575
  78. 10.1073/pnas.93.8.3428 · DOI
  79. 10.1007/BF00238949 · DOI · Paper page
  80. SCHMANKE T., 1996, J. Neurotrauma, 13, 293, 10.1089/neu.1996.13.293 · DOI
  81. 10.1089/neu.1995.12.943 · DOI
  82. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1995.65052209.x · DOI
  83. 10.3171/jns.1996.84.4.0655 · DOI
  84. 10.1089/neu.1991.8.259 · DOI
  85. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-12-05383.1993 · DOI
  86. SMITH D.H., 1994, Lett., 168, 151
  87. 10.1016/0166-4328(94)00125-Y · DOI
  88. 10.1016/0166-4328(83)90188-2 · DOI · Paper page
  89. 10.1089/neu.1994.11.303 · DOI
  90. 10.1016/0165-0270(86)90111-1 · DOI
  91. 10.1089/neu.1988.5.315 · DOI
  92. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1996.66062477.x · DOI
  93. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-04-03193.1995 · DOI
  94. 10.1038/jcbfm.1988.109 · DOI
  95. 10.1038/jcbfm.1989.16 · DOI
  96. 10.1038/jcbfm.1991.117 · DOI
  97. 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91964-X · DOI
  98. YANG K, 1995, Lett., 197, 101
  99. 10.1002/jnr.490420415 · DOI
  100. YOUNG W., 1992, J. Neurotrauma, 9, S9
  101. 10.1089/neu.1988.5.289 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 120

Metadata

Authors
BALDWIN, S. A., GIBSON, T., CALLIHAN, C. T., SULLIVAN, P. G., PALMER, E., & SCHEFF, S. W.
Venue
Journal of Neurotrauma
Published
1997-06
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
385-398
ISSN
  • 0897-7151
  • 1557-9042
Cited by
120
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review