The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recommendations for the Use of Common Outcome Measures in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Open accessAbstract
This article addresses the need for age-relevant outcome measures for traumatic brain injury (TBI) research and summarizes the recommendations by the inter-agency Pediatric TBI Outcomes Workgroup. The Pediatric Workgroup's recommendations address primary clinical research objectives including characterizing course of recovery from TBI, prediction of later outcome, measurement of treatment effects, and comparison of outcomes across studies. Consistent with other Common Data Elements (CDE) Workgroups, the Pediatric TBI Outcomes Workgroup adopted the standard three-tier system in its selection of measures. In the first tier, core measures included valid, robust, and widely applicable outcome measures with proven utility in pediatric TBI from each identified domain including academics, adaptive and daily living skills, family and environment, global outcome, health-related quality of life, infant and toddler measures, language and communication, neuropsychological impairment, physical functioning, psychiatric and psychological functioning, recovery of consciousness, social role participation and social competence, social cognition, and TBI-related symptoms. In the second tier, supplemental measures were recommended for consideration in TBI research focusing on specific topics or populations. In the third tier, emerging measures included important instruments currently under development, in the process of validation, or nearing the point of published findings that have significant potential to be superior to measures in the core and supplemental lists and may eventually replace them as evidence for their utility emerges.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note
Goodman, R. (1997) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x · Cited by 14,908
Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03203267 · Cited by 7,230
The PedsQL™: Measurement Model for the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory
Varni, J. W., Seid, M., & Rode, C. A. (1999) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199902000-00003 · Cited by 3,291
Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., Ader, D., Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., & Rose, M. (2007) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55 · Cited by 3,118
BIRMAHER, B., KHETARPAL, S., BRENT, D., CULLY, M., BALACH, L., KAUFMAN, J., & NEER, S. M. (1997) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-199704000-00018 · Cited by 2,846
Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System
Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. H. (2012) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t15082-000 · Cited by 2,683
BIRMAHER, B., BRENT, D. A., CHIAPPETTA, L., BRIDGE, J., MONGA, S., & BAUGHER, M. (1999) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-199910000-00011 · Cited by 2,252
Goodman, R., Ford, T., Simmons, H., Gatward, R., & Meltzer, H. (2000) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.177.6.534 · Cited by 1,818
Goodman, R., & Scott, S. (1999) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1022658222914 · Cited by 1,420
The University of California at Los Angeles post-traumatic stress disorder reaction index
Steinberg, A. M., Brymer, M. J., Decker, K. B., & Pynoos, R. S. (2004) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-004-0048-2 · Cited by 1,212 · cited 4×
“The parent and child versions of the SCARED (Birmaher et al., 1997, 1999; Hale et al., 2005; Monga et al., 2000) are 41-item self-report questionnaires measuring symptoms of DSM-IV defined anxiety disorders except for obsessive-compulsive disorder.”
Influential
Cited by
Hicks, R., Giacino, J., Harrison-Felix, C., Manley, G., Valadka, A., & Wilde, E. A. (2013) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2013.2938 · Cited by 183
Self-citationRoth, R. M., Isquith, P. K., & Gioia, G. A. (2014) · Handbook of Executive Functioning · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8106-5_18 · Cited by 188
Self-citationWade, S. L., Stancin, T., Kirkwood, M., Brown, T. M., McMullen, K. M., & Taylor, H. G. (2014) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0b013e31828f9fe8 · Cited by 97
Self-citationThe incremental value of neuropsychological assessment: A critical review
Donders, J. (2020) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2019.1575471 · Cited by 87
Finnanger, T. G., Andersson, S., Chevignard, M., Johansen, G. O., Brandt, A. E., Hypher, R. E., Risnes, K., Rø, T. B., & Stubberud, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2021.761755 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- McCauley, S. R., Wilde, E. A., Anderson, V. A., Bedell, G., Beers, S. R., Campbell, T. F., Chapman, S. B., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Gerring, J. P., Gioia, G. A., Levin, H. S., Michaud, L. J., Prasad, M. R., Swaine, B. R., Turkstra, L. S., Wade, S. L., & Yeates, K. O.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurotrauma
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 678-705
- ISSN
- 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9042
- OpenAlex
- W2027039935
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 10.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recommendations for the Use of Common Outcome Measures in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/neu.2011.1838
- The paper
- McCauley, S. R., Wilde, E. A., Anderson, V. A., Bedell, G., Beers, S. R., Campbell, T. F., Chapman, S. B., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Gerring, J. P., Gioia, G. A., Levin, H. S., Michaud, L. J., Prasad, M. R., Swaine, B. R., Turkstra, L. S., Wade, S. L., & Yeates, K. O. (2012). Recommendations for the Use of Common Outcome Measures in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Research. Journal of Neurotrauma. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2011.1838
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
