CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 624Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Longitudinal Follow-Up of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: Outcome at Two, Five, and Ten Years Post-Injury

Ponsford, Jennie L., Downing, Marina G., Olver, John, Ponsford, Michael, Acher, Rose, Carty, Meagan, Spitz, Gershon·2014·Journal of Neurotrauma
DOI 10.1089/neu.2013.2997
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The deleterious consequences of traumatic brain injury (TBI) impair capacity to return to many avenues of pre-morbid life. However, there has been limited longitudinal research examining outcome beyond five years post-injury. The aim of this study was to examine aspects of function, previously shown to be affected following TBI, over a span of 10 years. One hundred and forty one patients with TBI were assessed at two, five, and 10 years post-injury using the Structured Outcome Questionnaire. Fatigue and balance problems were the most common neurological symptoms, with reported rates decreasing only slightly during the 10-year period. Mobility outcomes were good in more than 75% of patients, with few participants requiring aids for mobility. Changes in cognitive, communication, behavioral, and emotional functions were reported by approximately 60% of the sample at all time points. Levels of independence in activities of daily living were high during the 10-year period, and as many as 70% of subjects returned to driving. Nevertheless, approximately 40% of patients required more support than before their injury. Only half the sample returned to previous leisure activities and fewer than half were employed at each assessment time post-injury. Although marital status remained stable over time, approximately 30% of participants reported difficulties in personal relationships. Older age at injury did not substantially alter the pattern of changes over time, except in employment. Ove…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/neu.2013.2997

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Thomsen I.V., 1992, Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. Suppl., 26, 142
  2. Sloan S., 2012, Traumatic Brain Injury: Rehabilitation for Everyday Adaptive Living, 99

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 624

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ponsford, J. L., Downing, M. G., Olver, J., Ponsford, M., Acher, R., Carty, M., & Spitz, G.
Affiliations
Epworth Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Ponsford, Jennie L.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Neurotrauma
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2014-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
64-77
ISSN
  • 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9042
DOI
10.1089/neu.2013.2997
OpenAlex
W1976527985
Cited by
621
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 11
FWCI
18.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.liebertpub.com/nv/resources-tools/text-and-data-mining-policy/121/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Neurotrauma (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Transport Accident Commission
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, long-term outcomes, fatigue, balance problems, mobility (physical function), cognitive function, communication, activities of daily living, return to driving, employment, leisure, marital relationships, age at injury, rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Brain Injuries, Cognition, Disability Evaluation, Emotions, Employment, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Injury Severity Score, Treatment Outcome, Recovery of Function, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review