Cited by 25Workplace Health and Well-beingHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Worksite Health Promotion: The Value of the Tune Up Your Heart Program

Chung, Martin, Melnyk, Peter, Blue, Donald, Renaud, Donald, Breton, Marie-Claude·2009·Population Health Management

Abstract

Successful wellness initiatives at DaimlerChrysler Canada Incorporated (DCCI) led to a unique partnership between key stakeholders that allowed implementation of Tune Up Your Heart, a program aimed at improving workforce cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Volunteers were screened and stratified according to their CVD risk. Interventions were tailored to risk level and included goal setting, monitoring progress, and company-wide education programs. Outcome data (CVD risk and components of risk) were collected at study entry and after 18 months. The economic impact of the program was determined using a model based on subject movement across risk categories and historical claims data for life insurance, short- and long-term disability, prescription drugs, and casual absenteeism. Intervention participants (N = 343) demonstrated a significant ( P = .0113) relative CVD risk reduction of 12.7%; 36% of participants lost weight, and average body mass index decreased from 28.4 to 28.2 ( P = .0419). Average systolic and diastolic blood pressure significantly decreased ( P < .0001 and P = .0221, respectively). Subjects reported increased adherence to recommended exercise and diet regimens, and the number of smokers decreased by 14%. The majority of subjects reported satisfaction with the program. Annual savings were estimated at Can$793 for the intervention group and Can$18,461 when projected to the entire workforce (N = 13,629). Savings were sensitive to cost weighting when subjects moved to a lower risk class but more robust to other parameters. The Tune Up Your Heart program significantly improved employee CVD risk profile, and was associated with savings for DCCI. ( Population Health Management 2009;12:297–304)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/pop.2008.0044

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chung, M., Melnyk, P., Blue, D., Renaud, D., & Breton, M.-C.
Affiliations
  • Pfizer (Canada) (CA)
  • BioMedCom Consultants inc.
  • Aon Consulting Inc.
  • SOLUTIONS in Health Inc.
Corresponding author
Breton, Marie-Claude
Venue
Population Health Management
Published
2009-12
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
297-304
ISSN
  • 1942-7891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-7905
OpenAlex
W1993883142
Cited by
25
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Population Health Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • Pfizer Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
workplace health promotion, cardiovascular risk, employee wellness, cardiovascular risk screening, goal setting, blood pressure reduction, weight loss, smoking cessation
MeSH terms
Canada, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Program Evaluation, Program Development, Workplace, Risk Reduction Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review