Cited by 355Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchEmotion and Mood RecognitionSpeech Recognition and Synthesis

Spoken Language Derived Measures for Detecting Mild Cognitive Impairment

Open access
Roark, Brian, Mitchell, Margaret, Hosom, John-Paul, Hollingshead, Kristy, Kaye, Jeffrey·2011·IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing

Abstract

Spoken responses produced by subjects during neuropsychological exams can provide diagnostic markers beyond exam performance. In particular, characteristics of the spoken language itself can discriminate between subject groups. We present results on the utility of such markers in discriminating between healthy elderly subjects and subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Given the audio and transcript of a spoken narrative recall task, a range of markers are automatically derived. These markers include speech features such as pause frequency and duration, and many linguistic complexity measures. We examine measures calculated from manually annotated time alignments (of the transcript with the audio) and syntactic parse trees, as well as the same measures calculated from automatic (forced) time alignments and automatic parses. We show statistically significant differences between clinical subject groups for a number of measures. These differences are largely preserved with automation. We then present classification results, and demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in the area under the ROC curve (AUC) when using automatic spoken language derived features in addition to the neuropsychological test scores. Our results indicate that using multiple, complementary measures can aid in automatic detection of MCI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tasl.2011.2112351

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Acoustic, syntactic, and semantic features, including grammatical complexity and information content, can correlate strongly with cognitive decline.

    “Acoustic, syntactic, and semantic features, including grammatical complexity and information content, can correlate strongly with cognitive decline [11,32].”

    From A Conversational Robot for Older Adults with Alzheimer's Disease (2020) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Experimental Results (section IV.D; page not provided) report significant differences between healthy elderly subjects and those with mild cognitive impairment for some speech, syntactic, and content-density measures. But idea density did not differ significantly, and the study compares groups rather than measuring correlations with cognitive decline over time. The claim overgeneralizes both the measures and the outcome. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Other language tasks, such as naming, verbal fluency, and story recall, have also been used for automatic monitoring of AD.

    “Other language tasks, such as the naming task [20], the verbal fluency task [18], and the story recall task [32], have also been used for automatic monitoring of AD.”

    From A Conversational Robot for Older Adults with Alzheimer's Disease (2020) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Abstract and §II.B describe automatically derived measures from a story-recall task, supporting the portion of the sentence attached to this citation. But the study tests detection of mild cognitive impairment, not automatic monitoring of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease; naming and verbal-fluency tasks have separate citations in the citing sentence. The indexed passages provide section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The linguistic analysis for cognitive monitoring followed Fraser et al. [11] and Roark et al. [32] and was restricted to features automatically extractable from transcriptions.

    “Our linguistic analysis for cognitive monitoring has followed the work of Fraser et al. [11] and Roark et al. [32] and is restricted to examining features that can be automatically extracted from transcriptions of conversations.”

    From A Conversational Robot for Older Adults with Alzheimer's Disease (2020) · cites this paper as Roark et al. [32]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]Roark B Hosom J Mitchell M Kaye J Automatically derived spoken language markers for detecting mild cognitive impairment Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Technol. Aging (ICTA) 2007
  2. [20]Wechsler D Wechsler Memory Scale—Third Edition Manual San Antonio, TX The Psychological Corp 1997
  3. [44]Pahikkala T Airola A Boberg J Salakoski T Exact and efficient leave-pair-out cross-validation for ranking RLS Proc. AKRR08 2008 1 8

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roark, B., Mitchell, M., Hosom, J.-P., Hollingshead, K., & Kaye, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing
Published
2011-09
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
2081-2090
ISSN
  • 1558-7916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-7924
OpenAlex
W2136914353
Cited by
355
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Santen
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG024059, P30AG008017, P30AG024978)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Keywords
mild cognitive impairment, spoken language features, automated speech analysis, narrative recall, pause frequency, linguistic complexity, temporal alignment, syntactic analysis, neuropsychological test scores, older adults, speech biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review