The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Macrophage Phenotype as a Determinant of Biologic Scaffold Remodeling
Abstract
Macrophage phenotype can be characterized as proinflammatory (M1) or immunomodulatory and tissue remodeling (M2). The present study used a rat model to determine the macrophage phenotype at the site of implantation of two biologic scaffolds that were derived from porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) and that differed mainly according to their method of processing: the Restore device (SIS) and the CuffPatch device (carbodiimide crosslinked form of porcine-derived SIS (CDI-SIS)). An autologous tissue graft was used as a control implant. Immunohistologic methods were used to identify macrophage surface markers CD68 (pan macrophages), CD80 and CCR7 (M1 profile), and CD163 (M2 profile) during the remodeling process. All graft sites were characterized by the dense population of CD68+ mononuclear cells present during the first 4 weeks. The SIS device elicited a predominantly CD163+ response (M2 profile, p < 0.001) and showed constructive remodeling at 16 weeks. The CDI-SIS device showed a predominately CD80+ and CCR7+ response (M1 profile, p < 0.03), and at 16 weeks was characterized by chronic inflammation. The autologous tissue graft showed a predominately CD163+ response (M2) at 1 week, with a dual M1/M2 population (CD80+, CCR7+, and CD163+) by 2 and 4 weeks and moderately well organized connective tissue by 16 weeks. The processing methods used during the manufacturing of a biologic scaffold can have a profound influence upon the macrophage phenotype profile and downstream remodeling events. Routine histologic examination alone is inadequate to determine the phenotype of mononuclear cells that participate in the host response to the scaffold.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“promotion of M2-like phenotypes in vitro [40,44,153] and in vivo [152,154,155].”
From Immune Response to Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds: A Comprehensive Review (2025) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“Macrophages that polarized toward to the M2 phenotype are identified by high expression levels of IL‐10, CD163, and amplification of the Arginase 1 (Arg1) enzyme, hereby switching the focus to releasing signals for constructive tissue remodeling.[ 68 ]”
From Unraveling and Harnessing the Immune Response at the Cell–Biomaterial Interface for Tissue Engineering Purposes (2024) · cites this paper as [68]
In the citing paper
“Briefly, scaffold materials composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) have been shown to promote a switch from a predominantly M1 cell population immediately following implantation to a population enriched in M2 cells by 7–14 days post implantation [154–156].”
From Macrophage polarization: an opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine (2012) · cites this paper as [154]
In the citing paper
“However, modification of such scaffold materials with chemical crosslinking agents which delay or prevent macrophage mediated degradation inhibits the formation of the beneficial M2 response and results in downstream scar tissue formation [154].”
From Macrophage polarization: an opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine (2012) · cites this paper as [154]
In the citing paper
“This constructive remodeling response has been directly linked to the ability of the material to modulate macrophage phenotype [154–157].”
From Macrophage polarization: an opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine (2012) · cites this paper as [154]
In the citing paper
“Here we find that MΦ activation depends on biomaterial architecture in addition to previously implicated biomaterial chemistry and bioactivity (34–36).”
From Proangiogenic scaffolds as functional templates for cardiac tissue engineering (2010) · cites this paper as [35]
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Only a specific subset of human peripheral-blood monocytes has endothelial-like functional capacity
Elsheikh, E. B., Uzunel, M., He, Z., Holgersson, J., Nowak, G., & Sumitran–Holgersson, S. (2005) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2005-04-1407 · Cited by 114
RetractedThe chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization
MANTOVANI, A., SICA, A., SOZZANI, S., ALLAVENA, P., VECCHI, A., & LOCATI, M. (2004) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2004.09.015 · Cited by 6,534
MANTOVANI, A., SOZZANI, S., LOCATI, M., ALLAVENA, P., & SICA, A. (2002) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/s1471-4906(02)02302-5 · Cited by 5,528
Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity
Gordon, S., & Taylor, P. R. (2005) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1733 · Cited by 5,190
Foreign body reaction to biomaterials
Anderson, J. M., Rodriguez, A., & Chang, D. T. (2008) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 · Cited by 5,138 · cited 1×
“2 However, phenotypic and functional polarization of the mononuclear phagocyte cell population has recently been described, 3–6 which is similar to the Th1/Th2 polarization scheme of lymphocytes.”
Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine
Ratner, B. D., Hoffman, A. S., Schöen, F. J., & Lemons, J. E. (1996) · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-02433-7 · Cited by 5,125
M-1/M-2 Macrophages and the Th1/Th2 Paradigm
Mills, C. D., Kincaid, K., Alt, J. M., Heilman, M. J., & Hill, A. M. (2000) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6166 · Cited by 3,287
The many faces of macrophage activation
Mosser, D. M. (2003) · Journal of Leukocyte Biology · doi:10.1189/jlb.0602325 · Cited by 1,902
Biological Responses to Materials
Anderson, J. M. (2001) · Annual Review of Materials Research · doi:10.1146/annurev.matsci.31.1.81 · Cited by 1,465
Macrophage Polarization Comes of Age
Mantovani, Sica, & Locati, M. (2005) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2005.10.001 · Cited by 1,259
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 16. Burke, B., and Lewis, C.E., eds. The Macrophage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–728 of 728
Biomaterials modulation of the tumor immune environment for cancer immunotherapy
Wolf, M. T. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821440-4.00004-9
Itoh, M., Imasu, H., Takano, K., Umezu, M., Okazaki, K., & Iwasaki, K. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1030698/v1
M13 phage surface induced modulation of macrophage polarization promotes anti-inflammatory responsesPreprint
Safari, Z., Sadeghizadeh, M., Asgaritarghi, G., Bardania, H., Sadeghizadeh, D., & Soudi, S. (2020) · doi:10.22541/au.160322401.17682041/v1
Gilbert, T. W. (2009) · The Annals of Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.12.008
Macrophage response in the immune microenvironment mediated by extracellular matrix: Recent progressPreprint
Chu, C., Xiao, W., Chu, C., Yang, Y., Rung, S., Dds, Y. M., Qu, Y., & Man, Y. (2022) · doi:10.22541/au.165712592.20624898/v1
Multicellular network analysis of melanoma heterogeneity by scRNA-seq.
Li, S., & Chen, L. (2023) · PubMed Central
Jin, J., Li, R., Chen, Y., Li, Z., Wu, Y., Guo, G., & Zheng, J. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2956995/v1
Paige, J. T., Lightell, D., Douglas, H. F., Klingenberg, N. C., Pham, T., & Woods, T. C. (2023) · Experimental Dermatology · doi:10.1111/exd.14845 · Cited by 2
Suspension Electrospinning of Decellularized Extracellular MatrixPreprint
Jones, S., VandenHeuval, S., Martinez, A. L., Burgeson, E. M., Raghavan, S. A., Rogers, S. A., & Cosgriff‐Hernandez, E. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.01.26.577473
Tissue-engineered constructions for skeletal muscle tissue repair
Korsakov, I. N., Петрович, С. Д., Eremin, I. I., Zorin, V. L., Deev, R. V., & Pulin, A. A. (2017) · Genes and Cells · doi:10.23868/gc120638 · Cited by 1
Macrophage profiles in drug-resistant tuberculosis patients and their close contacts: A pilot study
Handayani, D., Indratmo, M. F., Kusumaningrum, A., Ilham, A. F., Iswanti, F. C., & Sadikin, M. (2025) · Indian Journal of Tuberculosis · doi:10.1016/j.ijtb.2025.07.004
Insights into decellularized matrix-based therapeutic delivery systems in myocardial infarction
Bhattacharya, T., Kundu, M., Patil, P. D., Bhattacharya, I., Sibi, N. P., Sahu, A., Sarkar, S., Sreedhar, R., & Arumugam, S. (2025) · Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2025.107618
Karkanitsa, M. L., Wang, R. M., Lyons, A. C., Mesfin, J. M., Chen, A., Spang, M. T., Quintero, F., Sadtler, K., Hepokoski, M., & Christman, K. L. (2025) · npj Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41536-025-00435-w · Cited by 2
Comparative Structural and Functional Analysis of Micronized Collagen-Based Scaffolds
Dempsey, S. G., Smith, M. J., Danford, A., Wilson, A., Konar, S., Nursalim, Y., Veale, R. W. F., Yong, H., Taghavi, N., Yates, X., et al. (2025) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1177/19373341251396168
Tissue Injury and Biomaterial Treatment Modulate Tumor Growth and Response to ImmunotherapyPreprint
Ruta, A., Gray-Gaillard, E. F., Garcia, J. A., Huyer, L. D., Mathkour, Y., Cherry, C., Patatanian, M., Mejías, J. C., Maestas, D. R., Krishnan, K., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.02.02.703323
Validation pré-clinique d'un produit d'ingénierie vasculaire à base d'hydrogel de chitosane
Aussel, A. (2017) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/cd31a572z7ab3z44b4za98bze5efdce06580
Endothelial Hydrogels Improve Microvascular Regeneration and Perfusion in Tracheal Scaffolds
Hunter, M. O., Liu, L., Hochuli, N., Chan, O., Calyeca, J., Sher, A. C., & Chiang, T. (2026) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1002/lary.70564
Evolution from Supramolecular Polymer Grafts to Natural Tissue: The aXess Device
Mestres, G., Bauer, H., Cox, M. A. J., Riambau, V., & Moll, F. L. (2026) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1014621
Liu, Y., O’Brien, E. M., Lottinger, C., Perumal, G., Spiller, K. L., & Kuhn, L. T. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9624236/v1
Conservative Safety Assessment of a Nitinol Microhook Coaptation Device on Intact Nerve
Isaacs, J. E., Bendale, G. S., Gomatam, A., Richard, H. T., Reiter, C. R., Savsani, K., Mazur, M., Allen, T., & Clough, N. (2026) · Muscle & Nerve · doi:10.1002/mus.70346
Bioengineering strategies to interrogate and modulate the aging immune system
Nikolich‐Žugich, J., Wolf, M. T., Pompano, R. R., & Maisel, K. (2026) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-026-01187-y
França, C. M., Shakir, F., & Bertassoni, L. E. (2026) · Journal of Endodontics · doi:10.1016/j.joen.2026.08.020
Immunotechnology-based toolbox for care of chronic wounds
Gupta, M. N., & Ambre, P. (2026) · Frontiers in Biomaterials Science · doi:10.3389/fbiom.2026.1979352
Prasad, P., Kašpárková, V., Münster, L., Schrammová, M., Sádecká, M., Trchová, M., Humpolíček, P., & Víchová, Z. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7619826
O’Rourke, S. A., Gonnella, G., Kronemberger, G. S., Petrousek, S., Hoey, D. A., Dunne, A., & Kelly, D. J. (2026) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.70155
Metadata
- Authors
- Badylak, S. F., Valentin, J. E., Ravindra, A. K., McCabe, G. P., & Stewart-Akers, A. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
- Corresponding author
- Badylak, Stephen F.
- Venue
- Tissue Engineering Part A
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1835-1842
- ISSN
- 1937-3341 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-335X
- OpenAlex
- W2042569529
- Cited by
- 729
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 28.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Tissue Engineering Part A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR054940)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Keywords
- macrophage phenotype, M1/M2 macrophages, porcine small intestinal submucosa, carbodiimide crosslinking, chronic inflammation, CD163, CD80, CCR7, CD68, tissue grafts
- MeSH terms
- CD163 Antigen, Animals, Immunohistochemistry, Macrophages, Random Allocation, Receptors, Cell Surface, Swine, Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic, Antigens, CD, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, B7-1 Antigen, Tissue Engineering, Rats, Receptors, CCR7, Tissue Scaffolds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
