The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bioreactor Systems for Bone Tissue Engineering
Abstract
Bone graft material is often required for the treatment of osseous defects. However, due to limitations and risks associated with autologous as well as allogenic bone grafting procedures, alternative strategies are needed. In this context, ex vivo tissue engineering (TE) strategies for de novo generation of bone tissue include the combined use of autologous bone-forming cells and three-dimensional (3D) porous scaffold materials serving as structural support for the cells. Three-dimensional cultivation of osteoprogenitor cells presents several challenges, for example, insufficient nutrient and oxygen transport to and removal of waste products from the cells at the interior of the scaffold. By providing physical stimulation of tissue-engineered constructs and resolving mass transport limitations bioreactor systems denote key components for bone TE strategies. A variety of dynamic 3D bioreactor concepts mimicking the native microenvironment in bone tissue, for example, spinner flasks, rotating wall vessel constructs, perfusion bioreactors, and systems based on mechanical or electromagnetic stimulation of cell/scaffold composites, have been developed. These techniques differ considerably with respect to ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and degree of additional osteogenic stimuli, as well as monitoring and manipulation options. This review provides an overview of the concepts, advantages, challenges, and potential future applications associated with current bioreactor systems for bone TE.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kern, S., Eichler, H., Stoeve, J., Klüter, H., & Bieback, K. (2006) · STEM CELLS · doi:10.1634/stemcells.2005-0342 · Cited by 3,370
Tissue-engineered bone regeneration
Petite, H., Viateau, V., Bensaïd, W., Meunier, A., de Pollak, C., Bourguignon, M., Oudina, K., Sedel, L., & Guillemin, G. (2000) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/79449 · Cited by 1,475
Parfitt, A. M. (2002) · Bone · doi:10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00642-1 · Cited by 462
Schwarz, R. P., Goodwin, T. J., & Wolf, D. A. (1992) · Journal of Tissue Culture Methods · doi:10.1007/bf01404744 · Cited by 399
Cited by
Strategies for controlled delivery of growth factors and cells for bone regeneration
Vo, T. N., Kasper, F. K., & Mikos, A. G. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.01.016 · Cited by 666
Role of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Bone Regenerative Medicine: What Is the Evidence?
Oryan, A., Kamali, A., Moshiri, A., & Baghaban Eslaminejad, M. (2017) · Cells Tissues Organs · doi:10.1159/000469704 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Rauh, J., Milan, F., Günther, K.-P., & Stiehler, M.
- Venue
- Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-06-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 263-280
- ISSN
- 1937-3368 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-3376
- OpenAlex
- W1974394551
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bioreactor Systems for Bone Tissue Engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/ten.teb.2010.0612
- The paper
- Rauh, J., Milan, F., Günther, K.-P., & Stiehler, M. (2011). Bioreactor Systems for Bone Tissue Engineering. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2010.0612
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.