Cited by 125Digital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMental Health Treatment and Access

E-Therapy for Mental Health Problems: A Systematic Review

Open access
Postel, Marloes G., de Haan, Hein A., De Jong, Cor A.J.·2008·Telemedicine and e-Health

Abstract

The widespread availability of the Internet offers opportunities for improving access to therapy for people with mental health problems. There is a seemingly infinite supply of Internet-based interventions available on the World Wide Web. The aim of the present study is to systematically assess the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning e-therapy for mental health problems. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the RCTs, based on a list of criteria for the methodological quality assessment as recommended by the Cochrane Back Review Group. The search yielded 14 papers that reported RCTs concerning e-therapy for mental-health problems. The methodological quality of studies included in this review was generally low. It is concluded that e-therapy may turn out to be an appropriate therapeutic entity, but the evidence needs to be more convincing. Recommendations are made concerning the method of reporting RCTs and the need to add some content items to an e-therapy study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/tmj.2007.0111

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The development of internet-delivered CBT and the internet in general has probably helped to increase awareness of CBT to the general public.

    “Since the treatment versus demand gap is large when it comes to most conditions for which CBT has been found to work [36], the development of internet-delivered CBT and the internet in general has probably helped to increase awareness of CBT to the general public”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Postel, M. G., de Haan, H. A., & De Jong, C. A. J.
Affiliations
  • Nijmegen Institute for Scientist Practitioners in Addiction (NL)
  • Tactus Addiction Treatment, Enschede, The Netherlands. Nijmegen Institute for Scientist Practitioners in Addiction, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Nijmegen Institute for Scientist Practitioners in Addiction, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Corresponding author
Postel, Marloes G.
Venue
Telemedicine and e-Health
Published
2008-09
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
707-714
ISSN
  • 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3669
OpenAlex
W2160591633
Cited by
125
References
51
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
e-therapy, online intervention, mental illness, methodological quality, randomized controlled trials, trial reporting quality, online therapy
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Humans, Mental Health, Netherlands, Research Design, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review