Cited by 251Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Reducing risk factors for eating disorders: Comparison of an Internet- and a classroom-delivered psychoeducational program.

Celio, Angela A., Winzelberg, Andrew J., Wilfley, Denise E., Eppstein-Herald, Dori, Springer, Elizabeth A., Dev, Parvati, Taylor, C. Barr·2000·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

This controlled trial compared Internet- (Student Bodies [SB]) and classroom-delivered (Body Traps [BT]) psychoeducational interventions for the reduction of body dissatisfaction and disordered eating behaviors/attitudes with a control condition. Participants were 76 women at a private university who were randomly assigned to SB, BT, or a wait-list control (WLC) condition. Measures of body image and eating attitudes and behaviors were measured at baseline, posttreatment, and 4-month follow-up. At posttreatment, participants in SB had significant reductions in weight/shape concerns and disordered eating attitudes compared with those in the WLC condition. At follow-up, disordered behaviors were also reduced. No significant effects were found between the BT and WLC conditions. An Internet-delivered intervention had a significant impact on reducing risk factors for eating disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.68.4.650

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Celio, A. A., Winzelberg, A. J., Wilfley, D. E., Eppstein-Herald, D., Springer, E. A., Dev, P., & Taylor, C. B.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2000
Volume
68
Issue
4
Pages
650-657
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2052016188
Cited by
251
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
17.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
eating disorders, body dissatisfaction, disordered eating, eating attitudes, psychoeducational intervention, online intervention, body image, women, university students, weight and shape concerns, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Attitude, Body Image, Female, Humans, Patient Compliance, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Risk Factors, Students, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review