Cited by 20Innovations in Medical EducationOnline and Blended LearningE-Learning and COVID-19

Alcohol abuse management in primary care: an e-learning course

Open access
Pereira, Celina Andrade, Wen, Chao Lung, Tavares, Hermano·2015·Telemedicine and e-Health

Abstract

Background: The mental health knowledge gap challenges public health. The Alcohol Abuse Management in Primary Care (AAMPC) is an e-learning course designed to cover alcohol-related problems from the primary care perspective. The goal of this study was to verify if the AAMPC was able to enhance healthcare professionals' alcohol-related problems knowledge. Materials and Methods: One hundred subscriptions for the AAMPC were offered through the federal telehealth program. The course was instructor-led and had nine weekly classes, delivered synchronously or asynchronously, at the students' convenience, using a varied array of learning tools. At the beginning, students took a test that provided a positive score, related to critical knowledge for clinical management, and a negative score, related to misconceptions about alcohol-related problems. The test was repeated 2 months after course completion. Results: Thirty-three students completed the course. The positive score improved significantly ( p <0.001), but not the negative score. Students with previous experience with e-courses presented greater improvement on the positive score ( p <0.036). Eighty-percent of the students thought the course excelled in meeting its objectives. Web conferences and video and audio recordings were the most appreciated learning tools. Course satisfaction was negatively related to frequency of Internet access (Spearman's rho=−0.455, p =0.022). Conclusions: E-learning was highly appreciated as a learning tool, especially by students with the least frequency of Internet use. Nonetheless, it worked better for those previously familiar with e-courses. The AAMPC e-course provided effective knowledge transmission and retention. Complementary strategies to reduce misconceptions about alcohol-related problems must be developed for the training of primary care staff.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/tmj.2014.0042

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pereira, C. A., Wen, C. L., & Tavares, H.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Pereira, Celina Andrade
Venue
Telemedicine and e-Health
Published
2015-03
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
200-206
ISSN
  • 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3669
OpenAlex
W1618588076
Cited by
20
References
27
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › E-Learning and COVID-19
Keywords
alcohol abuse, alcohol-related problems, primary care, online learning, continuing medical education, healthcare workers, knowledge gaps, telemedicine, web conferences, internet access, course satisfaction
MeSH terms
Alcoholism, Brazil, Computer-Assisted Instruction, Education, Medical, Educational Measurement, Female, Humans, Male, Primary Health Care, Students, Medical, Program Evaluation, Telemedicine, Disease Management, Education, Distance, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review