Cited by 82Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Computerized CBT for Adolescent Depression (“Stressbusters”) and its Initial Evaluation Through an Extended Case Series

Abeles, Paul, Verduyn, Chrissie, Robinson, Alexander, Smith, Patrick, Yule, William, Proudfoot, Judy·2009·Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: "Stressbusters" is an interactive computer software programme based on a clinically effective face-to-face CBT protocol for young people with depression. It was designed for teenagers with mild to moderate depression, and comprises eight 45-minute sessions. METHOD: Twenty-three young people (aged 12-16; mean age 14.87 years) with symptoms of depression were recruited from CAMHS teams in Manchester and London, and received the Stressbusters treatment (range 1 - 8 sessions, mode 8 sessions). RESULTS: On the K-SADS at initial assessment, 95% met diagnostic criteria for a depressive disorder, with a high group mean score of 35.48 (SD 9.84) on the MFQ. Post-treatment, 22% of young people met criteria for a depressive disorder, with the group mean score on the MFQ falling significantly below clinical cut-off to 20.32 (SD 11.75). These gains were maintained at 3-month follow-up. Significant improvements were also found in the adolescents' global functioning (CGAS), self-reported anxiety (RCMAS), depressive cognitions and attributions (ATQ and CTI-C), and in adolescent- and parent-reported emotional and behavioural difficulties (SDQ). CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these results provide promising preliminary data for the clinical efficacy of Stressbusters as a valid form of CCBT for adolescents with depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1352465808005067

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abeles, P., Verduyn, C., Robinson, A., Smith, P., Yule, W., & Proudfoot, J.
Affiliations
Royal Manchester Children's Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Abeles, Paul
Venue
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
Published
2009-01-06
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
151-165
ISSN
  • 1352-4658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1833
OpenAlex
W2123440047
Cited by
82
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
adolescent depression, mild to moderate depression, youth, clinical efficacy, maintenance of treatment gains, depressive cognitions, emotional and behavioral problems, self-reported anxiety, child and adolescent mental health services
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Severity of Illness Index, Social Behavior, Software, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review