The DOI matches its Crossref record; 125 of the 125 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecological Thinking: The Politics of Epistemic Location
Abstract
Arguing that ecological thinking can animate an epistemology capable of addressing feminist, multicultural, and other post-colonial concerns, this book critiques the instrumental rationality, hyperbolized autonomy, abstract individualism, and exploitation of people and places that western epistemologies of mastery have legitimated. It proposes a politics of epistemic location, sensitive to the interplay of particularity and diversity, and focused on responsible epistemic practices. Starting from an epistemological approach implicit in Rachel Carson’s scientific projects, the book draws, constructively and critically, on ecological theory and practice, on (post-Quinean) naturalized epistemology, and on feminist and post-colonial theory. Analyzing extended examples from developmental psychology, from medicine and law, and from circumstances where vulnerability, credibility, and public trust are at issue, the argument addresses the constitutive part played by an instituted social imaginary in shaping and regulating human lives. The practices and examples discussed invoke the responsibility requirements central to this text’s larger purpose of imagining, crafting, articulating a creative, innovative, instituting social imaginary, committed to interrogating entrenched hierarchical social structures, en route to enacting principles of ideal cohabitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia
Gilman, S. L., Deleuze, G., Guattari, F., & Massumi, B. (1989) · Journal of Interdisciplinary History · doi:10.2307/203963 · Cited by 22,692
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 50th Anniversary Edition
Kuhn, T. S., & Hacking, I. (2012) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226458144.001.0001 · Cited by 21,170
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development.
Johnson, M. M., & Gilligan, C. (1983) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2067520 · Cited by 11,111
Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism
Sweet, S. S. (1984) · Telos · doi:10.3817/0684060227 · Cited by 11,054
A Theory of Justice: Original Edition
Rawls, J. (1971) · doi:10.4159/9780674042605 · Cited by 9,496
Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter
Barad, K. (2003) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/345321 · Cited by 7,055
Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society
McKeon, M., & Williams, R. (1977) · Studies in Romanticism · doi:10.2307/25600068 · Cited by 6,815
Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity
Rorty, R. (1989) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804397 · Cited by 6,740
Cited by
Scientific and lay communities: earning epistemic trust through knowledge sharing
Grasswick, H. E. (2010) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-010-9789-0 · Cited by 140
“Speaking into the Void”? Intersectionality Critiques and Epistemic Backlash
May, V. M. (2014) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/hypa.12060 · Cited by 85
Citizen Knowledge: Markets, Experts, and the Infrastructure of Democracy
Herzog, L. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197681718.001.0001 · Cited by 80
Climate Change Science and Responsible Trust: A Situated Approach
Grasswick, H. (2014) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/hypa.12090 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Code, L.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York
- Published
- 2006-04-06
- OpenAlex
- W4256029971
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 125
- FWCI
- 13.75
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecological Thinking: The Politics of Epistemic Location. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/0195159438.001.0001
- The paper
- Code, L. (2006). Ecological Thinking: The Politics of Epistemic Location. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195159438.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.