The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
The Continuity of Mind
Open accessAbstract
The cognitive and neural sciences have been on the brink of a paradigm shift for over a decade. This book is intended to help galvanize the forces of dynamical systems theory, cognitive and computational neuroscience, connectionism, and ecological psychology that are needed to complete this paradigm shift. The book lays bare the fact that comprehending a spoken sentence, understanding a visual scene, or just thinking about the day's events involves the serial coalescing of different neuronal activation patterns, i.e., a state-space trajectory that flirts with a series of point attractors. As a result, the brain cannot help but spend most of its time instantiating patterns of activity that are in between identifiable mental states rather than in them. The chapters are arranged to present a systematic overview of how perception, cognition, and action are partially overlapping segments of one continuous mental flow, rather than three distinct mental systems. The early chapters provide experiential demonstrations of the gray areas in mental activity that happen in between discretely labeled mental events, as well as geometric visualizations of attractors in state space that make the dynamical-systems framework seem less mathematically abstract. The middle chapters present scores of behavioral and neurophysiological studies that portray the continuous temporal dynamics inherent in categorization, language comprehension, visual perception, as well as attention, action, and reasoning. The final chapters conclude with discussions of what the mind itself must look like if its activity is continuous in time and its contents are distributed in state space.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“By implication, every category implemented in any human brain is an ad hoc event 139,145-147 : its features of equivalence are always constructed in a particular individual for a particular function in a particular situation.”
From A new science of emotion: implications for functional neurological disorder (2022) · cites this paper as [147]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic Patterns. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Port, R. & Van Gelder, T. (1995). Mind as Motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Spivey, M. (in preparation). The Continuity of Mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Thelen, E. & Smith, L. (1993). A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Van Orden, G., Holden, J., & Turvey, M. (in press). Self-organization of cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pupillometry: A Window to the Preconscious?
Laeng, B., Sirois, S., & Gredebäck, G. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611427305 · Cited by 921
The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic
Smith, N. J., & Levy, R. (2013) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.013 · Cited by 725
Barrett, L. F. (2012) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0027555 · Cited by 503
Embodied choice: how action influences perceptual decision making
Lepora, N. F., & Pezzulo, G. (2015) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004110 · Cited by 209
The sense of should: A biologically-based framework for modeling social pressure
Theriault, J. E., Young, L., & Barrett, L. F. (2021) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2020.01.004 · Cited by 201
Metadata
- Authors
- Spivey, M.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Spivey, Michael
- ORCID
- Spivey, Michael
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2006-12-21
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 25
- OpenAlex
- W2127151274
- Cited by
- 599
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 5.99
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.escholarship.org
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Keywords
- dynamical systems theory, state trajectories, attractors, connectionism, ecological psychology, cognitive neuroscience, language comprehension, visual perception, categorization, attention, reasoning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Continuity of Mind. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195170788.001.0001
- The paper
- Spivey, M. (2006). The Continuity of Mind. Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780195170788.001.0001