The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Science of Memory
Abstract
Scientists currently study memory from many different perspectives: neurobiological, ethological, animal conditioning, cognitive, behavioral neuroscience, social, and cultural. This book aims to help initiate a new science of memory by bringing these perspectives together to create a unified understanding of the topic. The book began with a conference where leading practitioners from all these major approaches met to analyze and discuss sixteen concepts crucial to our understanding of memory. Each of these sixteen concepts is addressed in a different part of the book, and in the sixty-six chapters that fill these parts, a leading researcher addresses the chapter's concept by clearly stating his or her position on it, elucidating how it is used, and discussing how it should be used in future research. For some concepts, there is general agreement among practitioners from different fields and levels of analysis, but for others there is general disagreement and much controversy. A final chapter in each part, also written by a leading researcher, integrates the various viewpoints offered on the part's concept, then draws conclusions about the concept.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, in the field of memory science, it has been recognized that the alignment of cross-disciplinary understanding of key concepts (e.g. learning and retrieval) is critical for a successful science of memory (Roediger et al. 2007).”
From An academic survey on theoretical foundations, common assumptions and the current state of consciousness science (2022) · cites this paper as Roediger et al. 2007
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The future of memory: remembering, imagining, and the brain
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., Hassabis, D., Martin, V. C., Spreng, R. N., & Szpunar, K. K. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.11.001 · Cited by 1,398
The Molecular and Systems Biology of Memory
Kandel, E. R., Dudai, Y., & Mayford, M. R. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.001 · Cited by 1,134
Self-citationMental Time Travel? A Neurocognitive Model of Event Simulation.
Addis, D. R. (2020) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-020-00470-0 · Cited by 225
Francken, J. C., Beerendonk, L., Molenaar, D., Fahrenfort, J. J., Kiverstein, J. D., Seth, A. K., & van Gaal, S. (2022) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niac011 · Cited by 136
“For example, in the field of memory science, it has been recognized that the alignment of cross-disciplinary understanding of key concepts (e.g. learning and retrieval) is critical for a successful science of memory (Roediger et al. 2007).”
BackgroundIs episodic-like memory like episodic memory?
Davies, J. R., & Clayton, N. S. (2024) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0397 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Roediger, H. L., Dudai, Y., & Fitzpatrick, S. M.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2007-05-10
- OpenAlex
- W576634518
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 6.85
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- memory, memory studies, neurobiology of memory, ethology, animal conditioning, cognitive psychology, psychobiology, social memory, cultural memory, memory concepts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review