The DOI matches its Crossref record; 130 of the 130 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Philosophy of Sociality: The Shared Point of View
Abstract
The intuitive starting point of the book is the distinction between thinking and acting as a private person versus as a group member. People may view things from their own personal viewpoint and base their thinking and acting on this “I-perspective”. They can then be said to operate as private persons, in the I-mode, even when they are engaged in social action with others. Alternatively, they may adopt the perspective of their social group and view things from a full “we-perspective”, that is, from the group's point of view that is constituted and shared by its members. Then they can be said to operate in the we-mode. The most central thesis of the book is that collective intentionality is an essential ingredient in sociality and that especially we-mode collective intentionality is important. Social life and social institutions cannot be properly understood or explained in terms of I-mode concepts only, and in certain respects the we-mode can even be seen as primary when compared to the I-mode. The book develops a systematic theory of sociality giving special emphasis on phenomena of collective intentionality, such as joint intentions, collective commitment, collective action, and group beliefs. The theory is used to investigate such topics as social institutions, cooperation, cultural evolution, and group responsibility. We-mode intentionality is compared with various forms of I-mode intentionality, and it is argued that the we-mode is irreducible to the I-mode. Yet the present book defends a naturalistic view of the social world. Accordingly, it is argued that the we-mode is an adaptation based on the co-evolution of genetic and cultural factors. The present book offers new ideas and conceptual tools for philosophers and social scientists interested in the conceptual and philosophical foundations of social theorizing.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Justice: Original Edition
Rawls, J. (1971) · doi:10.4159/9780674042605 · Cited by 9,496
Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self‐Categorization Theory
REID, F. J. M. (1987) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1987.tb00799.x · Cited by 8,145
Nash, J. F. (1950) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1907266 · Cited by 8,046
Culture and the Evolutionary Process
Griesemer, J. R., Boyd, R. T., & Richerson, P. J. (1986) · Ornithological Applications · doi:10.2307/1367778 · Cited by 7,133
The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition
Tomasello, M. (2009) · doi:10.2307/j.ctvjsf4jc · Cited by 6,368
The Rules of Sociological Method
Durkheim, É. (1982) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-16939-9 · Cited by 4,719
Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind
Searle, J. R. (1983) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173452 · Cited by 4,575
Individualism and collectivism
OETZEL, J. G. (1996) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/0147-1767(96)83678-9 · Cited by 3,808
The phenomenology of the social world
Bittner, E., Schutz, A., Walsh, G., & Lehnert, F. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092457 · Cited by 3,588
Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution
Levinson, M. H. (2006) · ETC.: A Review of General Semantics · doi:10.66774/etc_6303_351 · Cited by 3,581
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 70
- Aronson,, 2005, Social Psychology
- Asch,, 1987, Social Psychology
- Atkinson,, 1970, The Dynamics of Action
- Aunger,, 2000, Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science
- Belnap,, 2001, Facing the Future: Agents and Choices in Our Indeterministic World
- Blackmore,, 1999, The Meme Machine
- Boyd,, 1996, Evolution of Social Behaviour Patterns in Primates and Man
- Boyd,, 2004, Evolution and Culture
- Boyd,, 2003, How Humans Evolved
- Bratman,, 2004, Reason and Value
- Brewer,, 2003, Intergroup Relations
- Brown,, 2000, Group Processes
- Capozza,, 2000, Social Identity Processes
- Carnap,, 1966, Philosophical Foundations of Physics
- Castelfranchi,, 1995, Proceedings of ICMAS '95
- Cohen,, 1997, Contemporary Action Theory
- De, 2004, Science, The Neural Basis of Altruistic Punishment.
- Gallese,, 2001, The ‘Shared Manifold, Journal of Consciousness Studies
- Giddens,, 1984, The Constitution of Society
- Gilbert,, 1989, On Social Facts
- Gilbert,, 2000, Sociality and Responsibility
- Gilbert,, 2002, Social Facts and Collective Intentionality
- Gilbert,, 2002, Social Facts and Collective Intentionality
- Gintis,, 2005, Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life
- Grice,, 1989, Studies in the Ways of Words
- Hakli, R., and Tuomela, R. 2003. “Cooperation and We-Mode Preferences in Multi-agent Systems.” Presented at the First International Workshop on Social Life (SOLI 2003) 305European Conference for Artificial Life, September 14–17. Available at: www.valt. helsinki.fi/staff/tuomela/papers/soli03.pdf.
- Heidegger,, 1980, Being and Time
- Hofstede,, 1994, Cultures and Organizations
- Hume,, 1965, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Hurley,, 2005, Perspectives on Imitation I–II
- Insko,, 1987, Group Processes
- Jaspers,, 1947, The Question of German Guilt
- Katz,, 2002, Evolutionary Origins of Morality
- Kusch,, 1997, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
- Liebrand,, 1992, Social Dilemmas
- Mathiesen,, 2002, Social Facts and Collective Intentionality
- May,, 1991, Collective Responsibility
- Meijers,, 2003, John Searle's Ideas about Social Reality
- Mithen,, 1996, Evolution of Social Behaviour Patterns in Primates and Man
- Moscovici,, 1985, The Handbook of Social Psychology II
- Pettit,, 2001, A Theory of Freedom
- Preyer,, 2006, Soziologische Theorie der Gegenwartsgesellschaft: Mitgliedshaftstheoretische Untersuchungen
- Rawls,, 1993, Political Liberalism
- Raz,, 1986, The Morality of Freedom
- Rifkin,, 2004, The European Dream
- Rousseau,, 1960, The Social Contract
- Rovane,, 1998, The Bounds of Agency
- Sartre,, 1966, Being and Nothingness
- Scanlon,, 1998, What We Owe to Each Other
- Scheff,, 1967, American Sociological Review, Toward a Sociological Model of Consensus.
- Schein,, 1993, Plurals and Events
- Schelling,, 1960, The Strategy of Conflict
- Schiffer,, 1972, Meaning
- Schmid,, 2005, Wir-Intentionalität
- Schmitt,, 2003, Socializing Metaphysics: The Nature of Social Reality
- Searle,, 2001, Rationality in Action
- Searle,, 2003, Socializing Metaphysics: The Nature of Social Reality
- Smith,, 2003, ohn Searle''s Ideas about Social Reality
- Sperber,, 2000, Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science
- Storr,, 1993, Music and Mind
- Tuomela,, 2000, Rationality and Irrationality: Contributions of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society
- Tuomela,, 2002, Social Facts and Collective Intentionality
- Tuomela,, 2003, Socializing Metaphysics: The Nature of Social Reality
- Tuomela,, 2003, Kaltblütig, Philosophie von einem rationalen Standpunkt
- Tuomela,, 2003, Australasian Journal of Philosophy
- Tuomela,, 1992, Social Norms, Tasks, and Roles.
- Tuomela,, 1997, Contemporary Action Theory
- Turner,, 2003, Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processes
- Weber,, 1968, Economy and Society
- Zlotkin,, 1994, Rules of Encounter
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An integrated theory of language production and comprehension
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12001495 · Cited by 1,569
Ramstead, M. J. D., Veissière, S. P. L., & Kirmayer, L. J. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01090 · Cited by 422
Köhler, S. (2020) · Science and engineering ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00259-5 · Cited by 18
“However, different accounts disagree on what it takes to have such a shared intention (see e.g. Bratman 2013; Gilbert 1996; Searle 1995; or Toumela 2007).”
BackgroundCollaborative Irrationality, Akrasia, and Groupthink: Social Disruptions of Emotion Regulation
Szanto, T. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02002 · Cited by 12
“As Tuomela puts it, a group’s ethos is something that “functions as kind of underlying presuppositional reason for the participants’ actions” (Tuomela, 2007, p. 34).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Tuomela, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Tuomela, Raimo
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York
- Published
- 2007-09-01
- OpenAlex
- W2479674869
- Cited by
- 840
- References
- 130
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 317 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 12.61
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- sociality, collective intentionality, i-mode, shared intentionality, collective commitment, collective action, group belief, social institutions, cooperation, cultural evolution, collective responsibility, naturalism, social theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review