Sensorimotor agency

In the citing paper

“Related enactive approaches view cognition as constituted by the dynamic coupling between organism and environment, rather than as computation occurring within the brain (Di Paolo et al. 2017; Thompson and Varela 2001).”

In the citing paper

“These modulatory engagements are asymmetric (Di Paolo et al., 2017).”

In the citing paper

“The minimal organization that a situated system must realize to be called an agent may be realized in different ways, and may involve extra-bodily processes (as in the case of incorporation in sensorimotor agency discussed in Sect. 7, Di Paolo et al., 2017); but not just any extra-bodily process.”

In the citing paper

“Sensorimotor schemes are 'reusable, interlocking, organised sets of coordination patterns between body and environment' (Di Paolo et al., 2017, 81).”

In the citing paper

“Incorporation can be articulated in operational terms (for instance in terms of co-dependent participation in sensorimotor networks, Di Paolo et al., 2017, 175; Di Paolo et al., 2018, 29, 192ff, 330) and is manifested by certain phenomenological markers, such as a sense of empowerment, dependence, or extension of the lived body.”

In the citing paper

“This is particularly the case if we consider that the enactive concept of agency recognizes the plasticity of unfinished bodies and their boundaries, as well as the complexities of interventions involving the sense-making activities of multiple agents (Di Paolo et al., 2017, 2018).”

In the citing paper

“Examining the idea of mastery in action and perception, Di Paolo and colleagues (2017) elaborate a formalization of Piaget's equilibration theory and describe an agent's sensorimotor  repertoire in terms of precarious, operationally closed networks of sensorimotor schemes .”

In the citing paper

“Enaction explicitly investigates the way agency is enabled, shaped, honed, and constrained by sociomaterial processes (Di Paolo et al. 2017, 2018).”