The DOI matches its Crossref record.
HRM and Performance
Abstract
This title adopts a broad perspective that takes into account not only the strategic dimension of human resources management (HRM), but the professional and societal dimension. It combines academic research with a focus on practical conclusions and recommendations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Context-based approaches argue for an integrated system of (value) mutuality that bridges strategic versus human, economic rationality versus relational rationality, and efficiency versus fairness dichotomies to ultimately achieve performance, fairness, and social legitimacy.
“Rather than giving priority to either strategic necessities or human needs, context-based approaches argue for an integrated system of (value) mutuality that bridges strategic versus human, economic rationality versus relational rationality, and efficiency versus fairness dichotomies (Paauwe, 2004) to ultimately achieve the desired HR outcomes of performance, fairness, and social legitimacy.”
From Common Good HRM: A paradigm shift in Sustainable HRM? (2020) · cites this paper as Paauwe, 2004
The resource-based view is one of the most dominant theories in SHRM.
“Reflecting on the past 30 years of research, the resource-based view is one of the most dominant theories in SHRM (Paauwe, 2004).”
From Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT (2023) · cites this paper as Paauwe, 2004
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Budhwar, P., Chowdhury, S., Wood, G., Aguinis, H., Bamber, G. J., Beltran, J. R., Boselie, P., Lee Cooke, F., Decker, S., DeNisi, A., et al. (2023) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12524 · Cited by 908
Self-citationGuerci, M., Longoni, A., & Luzzini, D. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1065431 · Cited by 589
Common Good HRM: A paradigm shift in Sustainable HRM?
Aust, I., Matthews, B., & Muller-Camen, M. (2020) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100705 · Cited by 531
“Rather than giving priority to either strategic necessities or human needs, context-based approaches argue for an integrated system of (value) mutuality that bridges strategic versus human, economic rationality versus relational rationality, and efficiency versus fairness dichotomies (Paauwe, 2004) to ultimately achie…”
BackgroundConceptualising the future of HRM and technology research
Bondarouk, T., & Brewster, C. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1232296 · Cited by 438
An examination of e-HRM as a means to increase the value of the HR function
Parry, E. (2011) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.556791 · Cited by 193
People analytics effectiveness: developing a framework
Peeters, T., Paauwe, J., & Van De Voorde, K. (2020) · Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance · doi:10.1108/joepp-04-2020-0071 · Cited by 129
Self-citationParadox as a Lens for Theorizing Sustainable HRM: Mapping and Coping with Paradoxes and Tensions
Ehnert, I. (2014) · CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37524-8_11 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Paauwe, J.
- Affiliations
- Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Paauwe, Jaap
- ORCID
- Paauwe, Jaap
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2004-06-17
- OpenAlex
- W2992659256
- Cited by
- 577
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 52
- FWCI
- 15.06
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Organizational Practices
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Management
- Keywords
- human resource management, organizational performance, strategic human resource management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
