Cited by 909Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceVisual perception and processing mechanismsSpatial Cognition and Navigation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Case for Mental Imagery

Kosslyn, Stephen M., Thompson, William L., Ganis, Giorgio·2006·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

Preface Chapter 1. Mental imagery and mental representation Chapter 2. Evaluating propositional accounts Chapter 3. Evaluating experiment artifact accounts Chapter 4. Depictive representations in the brain Chapter 5. Visual mental images in the brain: Overview of a theory Chapter 6. Science and mental imager Appendix: Review of neuroimaging studies of visual mental imagery References

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179088.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., & Ganis, G.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2006-03-23
OpenAlex
W1792883256
Cited by
909
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 46
FWCI
23.59
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Keywords
mental imagery, mental representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review