Cited by 508Philosophy and History of SciencePhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceEmbodied and Extended Cognition

Integrating psychology and neuroscience: functional analyses as mechanism sketches

Piccinini, Gualtiero, Craver, Carl·2011·Synthese

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11229-011-9898-4

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Bayesian brain hypothesis emerged during a period of increasing mathematization in neuroscience and psychology, when computational approaches gained prestige and institutional support.

    “The Bayesian brain hypothesis emerged during a period of increasing mathematization in neuroscience and psychology, when computational approaches gained prestige and institutional support (Dupré 1993; Piccinini and Craver 2011).”

    From The myth of the Bayesian brain (2025) · cites this paper as Piccinini and Craver 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Piccinini, G., & Craver, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri–St. Louis (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Piccinini, Gualtiero
Venue
Synthese
Published
2011-03-11
Volume
183
Issue
3
Pages
283-311
ISSN
  • 0039-7857 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0964
OpenAlex
W2172094690
Cited by
508
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 8
FWCI
108.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Synthese (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
functional analysis, mechanistic explanation, cognitive ability, neural systems, philosophy of cognitive science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review