The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Origin of Concepts
Abstract
Only human beings have a rich conceptual repertoire with concepts like tort, entropy, Abelian group, mannerism, icon, and deconstruction. How have humans constructed these concepts? And once they have been constructed by adults, how do children acquire them? While primarily focusing on the second question this book shows that the answers to both overlap substantially. The book begins by characterizing the innate starting point for conceptual development, namely systems of core cognition. Representations of core cognition are the output of dedicated input analyzers, as with perceptual representations, but these core representations differ from perceptual representations in having more abstract contents and richer functional roles. The book argues that the key to understanding cognitive development lies in recognizing conceptual discontinuities in which new representational systems emerge that have more expressive power than core cognition and are also incommensurate with core cognition and other earlier representational systems. Finally, the book fleshes out Quinian bootstrapping, a learning mechanism that has been repeatedly sketched in the literature on the history and philosophy of science. It demonstrates that Quinian bootstrapping is a major mechanism in the construction of new representational resources over the course of children's cognitive development.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Rich causal interpretations of physical objects are evident in children by age 6 months (Carey 2009;Keil 2011).”
From The Interface Theory of Perception (2015) · cites this paper as Carey 2009
In the citing paper
“Agency detection is taken to be innate for many animals [83,84].”
From The social origins of consciousness (2025) · cites this paper as [83]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Richerson, P., Baldini, R., Bell, A. V., Demps, K., Frost, K., Hillis, V., Mathew, S., Newton, E. K., Naar, N., Newson, L., et al. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x1400106x · Cited by 639
The Interface Theory of Perception
Hoffman, D. D., Singh, M., & Prakash, C. (2015) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0890-8 · Cited by 329
Medin, D., Ojalehto, B., Marin, A., & Bang, M. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0088 · Cited by 146
Hoffman, D. D., & Prakash, C. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00577 · Cited by 103
Ausubel’s meaningful learning re-visited
Bryce, T. G. K., & Blown, E. J. (2024) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04440-4 · Cited by 84
The Cognitive Architecture of Digital Externalization
Skulmowski, A. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09818-1 · Cited by 76
The social origins of consciousness
Andrews, K., & Miller, N. (2025) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2024.0300 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Carey, S.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Carey, Susan
- ORCID
- Carey, Susan
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2009-08-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-41
- OpenAlex
- W2119017831
- Cited by
- 2,322
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 142 · 2025: 167 · 2024: 178 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 132 · 2020: 128 · 2019: 158 · 2018: 158 · 2017: 136 · 2016: 138 · 2015: 129 · 2014: 139 · 2013: 138 · 2012: 136
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Journal of Cognition and Development (publishedVersion)
- PsycEXTRA Dataset (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- concept learning, conceptual development, representation systems, cognitive development, children's learning, perceptual representation, abstract representation, philosophy of science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review