Cited by 146Psychology Research and BibliometricsInterdisciplinary Research and CollaborationResearch, Science, and Academia

Systems of (non-)diversity

Medin, Douglas, Ojalehto, Bethany, Marin, Ananda, Bang, Megan·2017·Nature Human Behaviour

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41562-017-0088

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Writing as if variation does not exist downplays the importance of sampling broadly and may lead to inappropriately aggregating across diverse groups or treating underrepresented groups as deficient.

    “Writing as if variation does not exist downplays the importance of sampling broadly, and may lead to inappropriately aggregating across diverse groups or treating underrepresented groups as deficient (19,49).”

    From Generic language in scientific communication (2019) · cites this paper as [49]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Medin, D., Ojalehto, B., Marin, A., & Bang, M.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Medin, Douglas
Venue
Nature Human Behaviour
Published
2017-04-18
Volume
1
Issue
5
ISSN
2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2606518483
Cited by
146
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 3
FWCI
13.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
Keywords
diversity in research, research methodology diversity, publication system, research funding, academic advancement, systems-level change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review