The Normative Web
Abstract
Many philosophers hold antirealist views about morality according to which moral facts or truths do not exist. Does this imply that other types of normative facts, such as epistemtic facts, do not exist? This book develops a positive answer to this question.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If an area includes claims used as premises in the skeptical argument, there are worries about self-defeat.
“Of course, if the area in question includes claims that are used as premises in the skeptical argument, then there are worries about selfdefeat”
From Hope for the Evolutionary Debunker: How Evolutionary Debunking Arguments and Arguments from Moral Disagreement Can Join Forces (2022) · cites this paper as Cuneo 2007
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The moral fixed points: new directions for moral nonnaturalism
Cuneo, T., & Shafer-Landau, R. (2014) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0277-5 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Self-citationThe nomological argument for the existence of God
Hildebrand, T., & Metcalf, T. (2022) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12364 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Are Evolutionary Debunking Arguments Self-Debunking?
Kyriacou, C. (2016) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/s11406-016-9780-1 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Tersman, F., & Risberg, O. (2022) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-022-10275-y · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cuneo, T.
- Corresponding author
- Cuneo, Terence
- ORCID
- Cuneo, Terence
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2007-09-06
- OpenAlex
- W2479492029
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 7.49
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Keywords
- normative facts, moral facts, normativity, moral truth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
