Cited by 270Philosophical Ethics and TheoryPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentEthics, Aesthetics, and Art

The moral fixed points: new directions for moral nonnaturalism

Cuneo, Terence, Shafer-Landau, Russ·2014·Philosophical Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11098-013-0277-5

Cites

122 of 122 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

14 of the 136 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cuneo, T., & Shafer-Landau, R.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Venue
Philosophical Studies
Published
2014-01-09
Volume
171
Issue
3
Pages
399-443
ISSN
  • 0031-8116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0883
OpenAlex
W2019272718
Cited by
270
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
87.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Philosophical Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
Keywords
moral realism, moral propositions, moral norms, moral metaphysics, moral epistemology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review