Why Red Doesn’t Sound Like a BellUnderstanding the feel of consciousness
Abstract
This book proposes a novel view to explain how we as humans—contrary to current robots—can have the impression of consciously feeling things: for example the red of a sunset, the smell of a rose, the sound of a symphony, or a pain. The book starts off by looking at visual perception. Our ability to see turns out to be much more mysterious than one might think. The eye contains many defects which should seriously interfere with vision. Yet we have the impression of seeing the world in glorious panavision and technicolor. Explaining how this can be the case leads to a new idea about what seeing really is. Seeing is not passively receiving information in the brain, but rather a way of interacting with the world. The role of the brain is not to create visual sensation, but to enable the necessary interactions with the world. This new approach to seeing is extended in the second part of the book to encompass the other senses: hearing, touch, taste, and smell. Taking sensory experiences to be modes of interacting with the world explains why these experiences are different in the way they are. It also explains why thoughts or automatic functions in the body, and indeed the vast majority brain functions, are not accompanied by any real feeling. The “sensorimotor” approach is not simply a philosophical argument: It leads to scientifically verifiable predictions and new research directions. Among these are the phenomena of change blindness, sensory substitution, “looked but failed to s…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This formulation is reminiscent of certain action-oriented or enactive approaches to consciousness, such as sensorimotor contingency theory.
“This formulation is reminiscent of certain action-oriented or enactive appro aches to consciousness, such as sensorimotor contingency theory (O'Regan, 2011; O'Regan & Noë, 2001; see also Seth, 2014).”
From Integrated information and predictive processing theories of consciousness: An adversarial collaborative review (2026) · cites this paper as O'Regan, 2011
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Information-seeking, curiosity, and attention: computational and neural mechanisms
Gottlieb, J., Oudeyer, P.-Y., Lopes, M., & Baranes, A. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.001 · Cited by 784 · see citing works
The Border Between Seeing and Thinking
Block, N. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197622223.001.0001 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Hard criteria for empirical theories of consciousness
Doerig, A., Schurger, A., & Herzog, M. H. (2021) · Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17588928.2020.1772214 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Cleeremans, A., Achoui, D., Beauny, A., Keuninckx, L., Martin, J.-R., Muñoz-Moldes, S., Vuillaume, L., & de Heering, A. (2020) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.11.011 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Reafference and the origin of the self in early nervous system evolution
Jékely, G., Godfrey-Smith, P., & Keijzer, F. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B · doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0764 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Keijzer, F. (2015) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10539-015-9483-1 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
The Grain of Vision and the Grain of Attention: The Grains of Vision and Attention
Block, N. (2012) · Thought A Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1002/tht3.28 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Guidelines for quantitative and qualitative studies of sensory substitution experience
Kałwak, W., Reuter, M., Łukowska, M., Majchrowicz, B., & Wierzchoń, M. (2018) · Adaptive Behavior · doi:10.1177/1059712318771690 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Corcoran, A. W., Haun, A. M., Dorman, R., Tononi, G., Friston, K. J., & Pennartz, C. M. A. (2026) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106742 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- O'Regan, J. K.
- Corresponding author
- O'Regan, J. Kevin
- ORCID
- O'Regan, J. Kevin
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2011-06-24
- OpenAlex
- W359755455
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 14.78
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Keywords
- consciousness, qualia, visual perception, sensory experience, color perception, color naming, change blindness, sensory substitution, pain, philosophy of mind
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review