Cited by 73Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceVisual perception and processing mechanismsEpistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

The Grain of Vision and the Grain of Attention: The Grains of Vision and Attention

Open access
Block, Ned·2012·Thought A Journal of Philosophy

Abstract

Often when there is no attention to an object, there is no conscious perception of it either, leading some to conclude that conscious perception is an attentional phenomenon. There is a well-known perceptual phenomenon—visuo-spatial crowding, in which objects are too closely packed for attention to single out one of them. This article argues that there is a variant of crowding—what I call “identity-crowding”—in which one can consciously see a thing despite failure of attention to it. This conclusion, together with new evidence that attention to an object occurs in unconscious perception, suggests there may be a double dissociation between conscious perception of an object and attention to that object, constraining the extent to which consciousness can be constitutively attentional. The argument appeals to a comparison between the minimal resolution (or “grain”) of object-attention and object-seeing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/tht3.28

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Due to the cost constraint, a conscious individual cannot attend to every stimulus that is sensed but must instead use selective attention that might miss some important stimuli.

    “Due to this cost constraint, (1) a conscious individual cannot attend to every stimulus that is sensed but must instead use selective attention (see for instance Tsuchiya and Koch, 2008; Chica et al., 2010; Block, 2012; Tsuchiya and Van Boxtel, 2013; Koch, 2019) that might miss some important stimuli;”

    From Phenomenal Consciousness and Emergence: Eliminating the Explanatory Gap (2020) · cites this paper as Block, 2012

    The Abstract and Crowding and memory section say that some objects can be consciously seen even when attention cannot single them out. The Introduction also describes unattended stimuli that apparently elude conscious perception. These passages support limits on attention and the possibility of missed stimuli, but do not attribute those limits to a cost constraint or establish the broader claim that selective attention is required for every conscious individual. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Block, N.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Block, Ned
Venue
Thought A Journal of Philosophy
Published
2012-09
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
170-184
ISSN
2161-2234 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120175700
Cited by
73
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Thought A Journal of Philosophy (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Keywords
conscious perception, attention, unconscious perception, double dissociation, object attention, minimal resolution, visual perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review