The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Competing Motives in the Partisan Mind: How Loyalty and Responsiveness Shape Party Identification and Democracy
Abstract
Party identification is generally considered the most powerful predictor of voting behavior. Yet, after 50 years of research, scholars continue to disagree over the implications of this well-known finding. Some argue that party identification constitutes a stable affective attachment that voters are motivated to defend, whereas others argue that party identification constitutes a running tally of voters’ objective evaluations. Thus, party identification may serve as a pervasive source of bias that undermines accountability or as an indispensable shortcut that makes it easier for voters to hold government accountable. Competing Motives in the Partisan Mind seeks to advance the literature beyond this impasse by relaxing the motivational assumptions underlying the literature’s two dominant models. The books’ dual motivations model allows partisans to act like loyal fans who are motivated to maintain allegiance to their team and also like good citizens who are motivated to hold parties accountable. The nature of party identification and its implications for democracy hinge on the interplay between these two motivational forces. Results show that when people disagree with their party’s issue positions, they attempt to develop justifications for maintaining their party identity. This allows them to fulfill their motivation to remain loyal without appearing to be bad citizens whose judgment is clouded by partisan bias. Of course, identity justification requires cognitive resources,…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While debate continues about the extent to which directional goals manifest (e.g., Druckman, 2012;Druckman & McGrath, 2019;Guess & Coppock, 2020), they seem prevalent in many political contexts (Bolsen et al., 2014;Groenendyk, 2013;Groenendyk & Krupnikov, 2021;Lavine et al., 2012;Leeper & Slothuus, 2014;Lodge & Taber, 2013).”
From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Groenendyk, 2013
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics
Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12394 · Cited by 1,183
Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Public Opinion Formation
Leeper, T. J., & Slothuus, R. (2014) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12164 · Cited by 722
Ditto, P. H., Liu, B. S., Clark, C. J., Wojcik, S. P., Chen, E. E., Grady, R. H., Celniker, J. B., & Zinger, J. F. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617746796 · Cited by 535
Bisgaard, M. (2015) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/681591 · Cited by 347
Affective Polarization or Partisan Disdain?
Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2018) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfy014 · Cited by 224
The Politics of Beauty: The Effects of Partisan Bias on Physical Attractiveness
Nicholson, S. P., Coe, C. M., Emory, J., & Song, A. V. (2016) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9339-7 · Cited by 210
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · doi:10.1017/9781108923323 · Cited by 175
Bakker, B. N., Yphtach Lelkes, B., & Malka, A. (2019) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/707616 · Cited by 149
How Getting the Facts Right Can Fuel Partisan‐Motivated Reasoning
Bisgaard, M. (2019) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12432 · Cited by 147
Mullinix, K. J. (2015) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-015-9318-4 · Cited by 137
Elite Polarization and Public Opinion: How Polarization Is Communicated and Its Effects
Robison, J., & Mullinix, K. J. (2016) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2015.1055526 · Cited by 124
Moving beyond panaceas in fisheries governance
Young, O. R., Webster, D. G., Cox, M. E., Raakjær, J., Blaxekjær, L. Ø., Einarsson, N., Virginia, R. A., Acheson, J., Bromley, D. W., Cardwell, E., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1716545115 · Cited by 119
How Norms Shape the Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics
Groenendyk, E. W., Kimbrough, E. O., & Pickup, M. A. (2022) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12717 · Cited by 104
Self-citationBartels, B. L., & Johnston, C. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316979754 · Cited by 90
What Motivates Reasoning? A Theory of Goal‐Dependent Political Evaluation
Groenendyk, E., & Krupnikov, Y. (2021) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12562 · Cited by 85
Self-citationGroenendyk, E. W. (2018) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12481 · Cited by 82
Self-citationEconomists and Public Opinion: Expert Consensus and Economic Policy Judgments
Johnston, C. D., & Ballard, A. M. O. (2014) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/684629 · Cited by 85
Christensen, J., Dahlmann, C. M., Mathiasen, A. H., Moynihan, D. P., & Petersen, N. B. G. (2018) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muy001 · Cited by 74
Individual Differences in Group Loyalty Predict Partisan Strength
Clifford, S. (2016) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9367-3 · Cited by 76
Malka, A., & Adelman, M. (2022) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592721004096 · Cited by 64
Negative partisanship is not more prevalent than positive partisanship
Lee, A. H., Yphtach Lelkes, B., Hawkins, C. B., & Theodoridis, A. G. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01348-0 · Cited by 57
How to study democratic backsliding
Druckman, J. N. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12942 · Cited by 56
Expressive Politics as (Costly) Norm Following
Pickup, M. A., Kimbrough, E. O., & de Rooij, E. A. (2021) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09667-6 · Cited by 55
The case for partisan motivated reasoning
Williams, D. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04223-1 · Cited by 57
Motivated reasoning and democratic accountability
LITTLE, A. T., SCHNAKENBERG, K. E., & TURNER, I. R. (2022) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055421001209 · Cited by 41
Emotion and Political Judgment
Johnston, C. D., Lavine, H. G., & Woodson, B. W. (2015) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912915593644 · Cited by 40
Winners, Losers, and Perceptions of Vote (Mis)Counting
Kernell, G., & Mullinix, K. J. (2017) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edx021 · Cited by 34
Party–Group Ambivalence and Voter Loyalty: Results From Three Experiments
Shufeldt, G. (2017) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x17705854 · Cited by 33
Operational Ideology and Party Identification
Chen, P. G., & Goren, P. (2016) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912916658551 · Cited by 30
Kalmoe, N. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108870504 · Cited by 30
Ditto, P. H., Liu, B., Clark, C. J., Wojcik, S. P., Chen, E. E., Grady, R. H., & Zinger, J. F. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2952510 · Cited by 31
Presidential Debates, Partisan Motivations, and Political Interest
Mullinix, K. J. (2015) · Presidential Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/psq.12187 · Cited by 29
Self-Esteem and the Development of Partisan Identity
Wolak, J., & Stapleton, C. E. (2019) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912919851556 · Cited by 28
Conditional Motivated Reasoning
Dickerson, B. T., & Ondercin, H. L. (2016) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912916684031 · Cited by 26
Christensen, J. (2018) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12520 · Cited by 22
Civic Duty and Political Preference Formation
Mullinix, K. J. (2017) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912917729037 · Cited by 23
Unreflective Partisans? Policy Information and Evaluation in the Development of Partisanship
Brader, T. A., & Tucker, J. A. (2018) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12480 · Cited by 22
Lerusse, A., & de Walle, S. V. (2022) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2022.2085777 · Cited by 16
Political surveys bias self‐reported economic perceptions
Bailey, J. (2022) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfab054 · Cited by 14
Stark, S., & Collignon, S. (2021) · Political Studies Review · doi:10.1177/1478929921995333 · Cited by 14
Gaffe Appeal A Field Experiment on Partisan Selective Exposure to Election Messages
Ryan, T. J., & Brader, T. A. (2015) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2015.62 · Cited by 13
The paradox of poor representation: How voter–party incongruence curbs affective polarisation
Marchal, N., & Watson, D. (2021) · The British Journal of Politics and International Relations · doi:10.1177/13691481211048502 · Cited by 12
Leeper, T. J., & Mullinix, K. J. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199756223-0237 · Cited by 12
DeMora, S. L., Merolla, J. L., Newman, B., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2024) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-024-09912-2 · Cited by 13
Priming Norms to Combat Affective Polarization
Mullinix, K. J., & Lythgoe, T. J. (2022) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129211073319 · Cited by 9
Kiil, F. (2023) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12929 · Cited by 10
Gordon, S. L., Struwig, J., & Roberts, B. J. (2017) · Politikon · doi:10.1080/02589346.2017.1357913 · Cited by 7
Civic education’s relationship to affective partisan divides later in life
Clark, C. H. (2021) · Education Citizenship and Social Justice · doi:10.1177/17461979211041332 · Cited by 9
Predicting Acceptance of Mormons as Christians by Religion and Party Identity
Smith, D. T. (2016) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfw022 · Cited by 6
Learning from the Past: Pandemics and the Governance Treadmill
Webster, D. G., Aytur, S., Axelrod, M., Wilson, R. S., Hamm, J. A., Sayed, L., Pearson, A. L., Torres, P. H. C., Akporiaye, A., & Young, O. R. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14063683 · Cited by 6
Looking Back, Looking Forward: ISPP at 40 and Future Directions for Political Psychology
Reynolds, K. J. (2018) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12509 · Cited by 6
Stoddard, J. D., & Chen, J. (2018) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2018.1504790 · Cited by 6
Gendered Ambivalence: The Structure of Attitudes About Female Candidates
Bauer, N. M. (2023) · Journal of Women Politics & Policy · doi:10.1080/1554477x.2023.2257122 · Cited by 5
‘Thin’ loyalty and declining attachment to the African National Congress
Braun, M. (2024) · Commonwealth and Comparative Politics · doi:10.1080/14662043.2024.2324522 · Cited by 6
Gratale, S. K., Sangalang, A., Maloney, E. K., & Cappella, J. N. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16193554 · Cited by 4
Chen, P. G., & Luttig, M. D. (2019) · Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2019.1651319 · Cited by 5
Gonthier, F. (2020) · Acta Politica · doi:10.1057/s41269-020-00148-6 · Cited by 3
Moral Leadership in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
Kidd, W., & Vitriol, J. A. (2021) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12782 · Cited by 4
How agenda setting works: A dual path model and motivated reasoning
Lee, N. Y. (2019) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/1464884919851882 · Cited by 3
Pulling for the Team: Competition Between Political Partisans
Huang, L., DeScioli, P., & Murad, Z. (2021) · Evolutionary Psychological Science · doi:10.1007/s40806-020-00272-8 · Cited by 4
van Holm, E. J. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3594967 · Cited by 4
Partisans like any other? How populist supporters assess the economy when their party is in office
Gonthier, F. (2023) · European Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s1755773923000206 · Cited by 4
Of Parochial Partisanship and Education: Towards Civic Duty or Polarization?
Asekere, G., & Amanor-Lartey, E. T. (2021) · Journal of Politics and Law · doi:10.5539/jpl.v15n1p7 · Cited by 2
The counter-theatricality of right-wing populist performance
Peetz, J. (2021) · Studies in Theatre and Performance · doi:10.1080/14682761.2021.1964818 · Cited by 1
Political Belief Systems Are Not Singularly Rooted in Alliance Psychology
Malka, A., & Federico, C. M. (2023) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2023.2274423 · Cited by 1
Kiil, F. (2025) · Politics and the Life Sciences · doi:10.1017/pls.2025.10001 · Cited by 1
Attitudes Surrounding Fairness and Competition in Sports Predict Choices to Partisan Gerrymander
Izatt, H. J., & Fuller, S. (2025) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-025-10086-8 · Cited by 1
Understanding Policy Attitudes: Effect of Affective Source Cues on Political Reasoning
Hrbková, L. (2016) · Masarykova univerzita eBooks · doi:10.5817/cz.muni.m210-8056-2016 · Cited by 1
Groenendyk, E. W. (2013) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2013.835691 · Cited by 1
Self-citationExperimental Evidence on the Role of Identity and Interest in Voting BehaviorPreprint
Pickup, M. A., & Kimbrough, E. O. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2851135 · Cited by 1
Klein, T., & Shammas, E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108870504.005
Klein, T., & Shammas, E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108870504.008
An Introduction to Partisan Warfare
Kalmoe, N. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108870504.002
General Policy Disagreement and Broadly Targeted Court-Curbing
Bartels, B. L., & Johnston, C. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316979754.004
Ballots in a Partisan Civil War
Kalmoe, N. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108870504.007
The Guardians of Judicial Independence
Bartels, B. L., & Johnston, C. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316979754.001
A Deep Dive into Supreme Court Evaluation and Support
Bartels, B. L., & Johnston, C. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316979754.003
Procedural Perceptions and Motivated Reasoning
Bartels, B. L., & Johnston, C. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316979754.007
The Deeply Involved Are Different
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.005
Pavlović, Z. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3939575
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.011
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.008
A House Divided against Itself?
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.002
Subtleties of Partisan Division
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.003
(2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.012
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.006
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.004
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.010
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.009
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.013
Perceptions of the Most Sacred Duty
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.007
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.001
Theories of Public Support for Court-Curbing
Bartels, B. L., & Johnston, C. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316979754.002
Kalmoe, N. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108870504.009
Kalmoe, N. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108870504.012
Bartels, B. L., & Johnston, C. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316979754.009
Kalmoe, N. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108870504.001
Kalmoe, N. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108870504.013
Kalmoe, N. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108870504.015
Partisan Stability & the Myth of Atlanta
Kalmoe, N. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108870504.010
Metadata
- Authors
- Groenendyk, E.
- Corresponding author
- Groenendyk, Eric
- ORCID
- Groenendyk, Eric
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2013-08-15
- OpenAlex
- W4237539593
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 8.70
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Keywords
- party identification, voting behavior, partisan bias, cognitive resources, partisan disagreement, democratic accountability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review