Cited by 152Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeNeurological disorders and treatments

Measuring the impact of Parkinson's disease with the Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life questionnaire

Hobson, P·1999·Age and Ageing

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the validity of the Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life (PDQL) questionnaire, a patient-specific multi-dimensional quality of life measure, in a community-based sample of patients with Parkinson's disease (PI)) using standardized measures of disease severity, depressive symptomatology and cognitive function. DESIGN: A group of 194 patients with probable PD were randomly selected from a community-based register and were invited to self-complete the 37-item PDQL. Disease severity was measured by the disease-specific Webster scale, cognition by the CAMCOG neuropsychological test and depressive symptomatology by the self-report 15-item GDS-15 geriatric depression scale. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients returned completed PDQL questionnaires. Significant differences (P < 0.05) emerged between the pooled PDQL score of patients grouped on the basis of disease severity. Depressive symptoms and cognition were also associated with poorer perceived quality of life as measured by the PDQL. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study are indicative of the validity of the PDQL as an important additional measurement which reflects the impact of PD from the patient perspective. It shows poorer quality of life to be associated with increasing age, disease severity more severe depressive symptomatology and impaired cognitive functioning. However, the responsiveness of this instrument in the evaluation of care in PD remains to be determined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ageing/28.4.341

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hobson, P.
Affiliations
Glan Clwyd Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Hobson, P
Venue
Age and Ageing
Published
1999-07-01
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
341-346
ISSN
  • 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2834
OpenAlex
W2152512767
Cited by
152
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Age and Ageing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, quality of life, questionnaire validity, disease severity, depressive symptoms, cognitive function, community-based patients, patient-reported outcomes
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Cognition Disorders, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Quality of Life, Regression Analysis, Sampling Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Sickness Impact Profile

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review