Cited by 47Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

The use of an implantable loop recorder in the investigation of unexplained syncope in older people

Open access
Armstrong, V. L.·2003·Age and Ageing

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Reveal is a patient activated implantable loop recorder device with an 18 month battery life now available to assist in the diagnosis of suspected syncope or arrhythmias. We present our experience using this device in older subjects referred to a dedicated falls and syncope clinic in whom usual clinical assessment had not satisfactorily identified an attributable diagnosis but where we still suspected a cardiovascular cause for syncope or falls. METHODS AND RESULTS: during the past 3 years 15 subjects (mean age 73 years, range 61-89 years) had Reveal implanted for symptoms of syncope alone (n=6; 40%) and unexplained falls (n=3; 20%) or symptoms of syncope and unexplained falls (n=6; 40%). Symptom duration was long (mean 48 months; range 4-200 months). Subjects had experienced significant morbidity, 6 subjects (40%) required A&E attendance or hospital admission and 4 (27%) experienced a fracture. Despite extensive and repeated investigations, which included 12-lead ECG, echocardiogram, 24-h ambulatory heart rate monitor, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitor, orthostatic blood pressure measurement, supine and erect carotid sinus massage, electroencephalogram, and passive and GTN head up tilt testing, the attributable diagnosis remained unexplained. Of the 15 subjects, 7 have activated the device at 4 (range 0-14) months after implantation. Bradycardia was identified in 3 and ventricular tachycardia in 1 subject. Two subjects did not activate the device during the 18 months it was in-situ. Four people had problems with device activation. This is comparable to rates noted using Reveal in younger subjects. CONCLUSION: Reveal offers additional diagnostic yield in complex elderly subjects with suspected cardiovascular causes of syncope or unexplained falls which have not been previously satisfactorily diagnosed despite extensive investigations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ageing/32.2.185

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In patients with unexplained falls, an attack could have been documented by ILR in 70% of patients, with an arrhythmic cause being responsible in 14%.

    “Patients with unexplained falls: in pooled data, an attack could have been documented by ILR in 70% of patients, with an arrhythmic cause being responsible in 14% 191-194”

    From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [192]

    The Results report that 7 of 15 patients activated the ILR and 4 had recorded arrhythmias; the cohort included patients with unexplained falls, syncope, or both. This supports the paper's inclusion as a study in pooled data, but it does not itself report the pooled figures of 70% with a documented attack and 14% with an arrhythmic cause in patients with unexplained falls. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Linzer M, Yang EH, Estes M, Wang P, Vorperian VR, Kapoor WN. Diagnosing syncope. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127: 76-86.
  2. McIntosh S, DaCosta D, Kenny RA. Outcome of an integrated approach to the investigation of dizziness, falls and syncope. Age Ageing 1993; 22: 53-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armstrong, V. L.
Affiliations
Royal Victoria Infirmary (GB)
Corresponding author
Armstrong, V. L.
Venue
Age and Ageing
Published
2003-03-01
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
185-188
ISSN
  • 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2834
OpenAlex
W2153069563
Cited by
47
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Age and Ageing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
implantable loop recorder, syncope, unexplained falls, older adults, bradycardia, ventricular tachycardia, device activation, diagnostic yield
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Syncope, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review