Cited by 39Mental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major Depression

Effects of a stepped-care intervention programme among older subjects who screened positive for depressive symptoms in general practice: the PROMODE randomised controlled trial

Open access
van der Weele, Gerda M., de Waal, Margot W. M., van den Hout, Wilbert B., de Craen, Anton J. M., Spinhoven, Philip, Stijnen, Theo, Assendelft, Willem J. J., van der Mast, Roos C. +1 more·2012·Age and Ageing

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: to determine (cost)-effectiveness of a stepped-care intervention programme among subjects ≥ 75 years who screened positive for depressive symptoms in general practice. DESIGN: the pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial with 12-month follow-up. SETTING: sixty-seven Dutch general practices. SUBJECTS: two hundred and thirty-nine subjects ≥ 75 years screened positive for untreated depressive symptoms (15-item Geriatric Depression Scale ≥ 5). METHODS: usual care (34 practices, 118 subjects) was compared with the stepped-care intervention (33 practices, 121 subjects) consisting of three steps: individual counselling; Coping with Depression course; and-if indicated-referral back to general practitioner to discuss further treatment. Measurements included severity of depressive symptoms [Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)], quality of life, mortality and costs. RESULTS: at baseline subjects mostly were mildly/moderately depressed. At 6 months MADRS scores had improved more in the usual care than the intervention group (-2.9 versus -1.1 points, P=0.032), but not at 12 months (-3.1 versus -4.6, P=0.084). No significant differences were found within two separate age groups (75-79 years and ≥ 80 years). In intervention practices, 83% accepted referral to the stepped-care programme, and 19% accepted course participation. The control group appeared to have received more psychological care. CONCLUSIONS: among older subjects who screened positive for depressive symptoms, an offered stepped-care intervention programme was not (cost)-effective compared with usual care, possibly due to a low uptake of the course offer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN 71142851v.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ageing/afs027

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Assuming a mean cluster size of five patients per counselor, an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.01, and a coefficient of variation of 0.30, 18 mental health counselors in each intervention arm and 90 participants per study arm are needed to detect a between-group difference on the GAD-7 with a medium effect size of d = 0.45, an alpha of 0.05 two-tailed, and a power of 0.80.

    “Assuming a mean cluster size of five patients per counselor, an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.01 [52] and a coefficient of variation of 0.30 [53], 18 mental health counselors in each intervention arm and 90 participants per study arm are needed to detect a between group difference on the GAD-7 with a medium effect size (d = 0.45) with an alpha of 0.05 (two-tailed) and a power of 0.80.”

    From An Internet-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy intervention for older adults with anxiety complaints: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. (2018) · cites this paper as [52]

    The citation is attached to the assumed intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.01. The paper’s Sample size calculation section instead states that it assumed an ICC of 0.2 for its cluster-randomised trial; it does not support the cited value of 0.01. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Weele, G. M., de Waal, M. W. M., van den Hout, W. B., de Craen, A. J. M., Spinhoven, P., Stijnen, T., Assendelft, W. J. J., van der Mast, R. C., & Gussekloo, J.
Affiliations
Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Venue
Age and Ageing
Published
2012-03-16
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
482-488
ISSN
  • 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2834
OpenAlex
W2065660631
Cited by
39
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Age and Ageing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • ZonMw (945-07-502)
  • Rivierduinen
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
stepped-care intervention, depressive symptoms, older adults, geriatric depression, cost-effectiveness, general practice, Geriatric Depression Scale, individual counseling, general practitioner referral, quality of life, mortality
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Counseling, Depression, Female, Health Services for the Aged, House Calls, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Mental Health Services, Motivation, Netherlands, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Education as Topic, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Referral and Consultation, Severity of Illness Index, Cluster Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Treatment Outcome, Health Care Costs, General Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review