Cited by 35Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlVestibular and auditory disorders

Safety and tolerability of Tilt Testing and Carotid Sinus Massage in the octogenarians

Open access
Ungar, Andrea, Rivasi, Giulia, Rafanelli, Martina, Toffanello, Giulia, Mussi, Chiara, Ceccofiglio, Alice, McDonagh, Ruth, Drumm, Breffni +3 more·2016·Age and Ageing

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the safety and tolerability of Tilt Testing (TT) and Carotid Sinus Massage (CSM) in octogenarians with unexplained syncope. METHODS: patients consecutively referred for transient loss of consciousness to the 'Syncope Units' of three hospitals were enrolled. TT and CSM were performed according to the European Society of Cardiology guidelines on syncope. Complications were evaluated in each group. An early interruption of TT was defined as 'intolerance' and considered as a non-diagnostic response. RESULTS: one thousand four hundred and one patients were enrolled (mean age 72 ± 16 years, male 40.8%). Six hundred and ninety-four patients (49.5%) were 80 years old or older (mean age 83 ± 3 years) and 707 (50.5%) were younger (mean age 60 ± 17 years). Complications after TT occurred in 4.5% of older patients and in 2.1% of the younger ones (P = 0.01). All complications were 'minor/moderate', as prolonged hypotension, observed in ∼3% of patients ≥80 years. Major complications such as sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, asystole requiring cardiac massage, transient ischaemic attack, stroke and death were not observed in any patient. The presence of orthostatic hypotension and the mean number of syncopal episodes were predictors of TT complications. Intolerance was reported in 2.4% of older patients and 1% of the younger ones (P = 0.08), mainly due to orthostatic intolerance. No complications occurred after CSM. CONCLUSIONS: TT and CSM appear to be safe and well tolerated in octogenarians, who should not be excluded by age from the diagnostic work-up of syncope.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ageing/afw004

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When pooling data from four studies in which 8720 patients were analysed, transient ischaemic attacks or strokes were observed in 21 patients (0.24%) after carotid sinus massage.

    “When pooling the data from four studies 90,95-97 in which 8720 patients were analysed, TIAs or strokes were observed in 21 (0.24%).”

    From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [96]

    The Discussion reports that neurological complications after carotid sinus massage are uncommon, with published rates of 0.17–0.45%, which is consistent with the claimed 0.24%. It does not report a pooled analysis of four studies, 8,720 patients, or 21 TIAs or strokes; the Methods describe this paper's study of 1,401 patients. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Orthostatic blood pressure measurements, carotid sinus massage, and tilt testing are well tolerated, even in the frail elderly with cognitive impairment.

    “Orthostatic BP measurements, CSM, and tilt testing are well tolerated, even in the frail elderly with cognitive impairment. 96,396,397”

    From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [96]

    The Conclusions state that tilt testing and carotid sinus massage were safe and well tolerated in octogenarians. The Methods say patients also had orthostatic BP measurements, but the paper does not report their tolerability or establish that the findings apply to frail patients with cognitive impairment; the Discussion calls for more study of shortened tilt protocols in frail patients. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Sabharwal S, Wilson H. Orthogeriatrics in the management of frail older patients with a fragility fracture. Osteoporos Int 2015; 26: 2387-99.
  2. Zeltzer J, Mitchell RJ, Toson B, Harris IA, Ahmad L, Close J. Orthogeriatric services associated with lower 30-day mortality for older patients who undergo surgery for hip fracture. Med J Aust 2014; 201: 409-11.
  3. Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L. Increased mortality in patients with a hip fracture-effect of pre-morbid conditions and post-fracture complications. Osteoporos Int 2007; 18: 1583-93.
  4. Simunovic N, Devereaux PJ, Sprague S et al. Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications: sys- tematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 2010; 182: 1609-16.
  5. Marcantonio ER, Flacker JM, Wright RJ, Resnick NM. Reducing delirium after hip fracture: a randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49: 516-22.
  6. Huntjens KMB, van Geel TCM, Geusens PP et al. Impact of guideline implementation by a fracture nurse on subsequent fractures and mortality in patients presenting with non- vertebral fractures. Injury 2011; 42: S39-43.
  7. Huntjens KM, van Geel TA, van den Bergh JP et al. Fracture liaison service: impact on subsequent nonvertebral fracture in- cidence and mortality. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96: e29.
  8. Lawrence TM, Wenn R, Boulton CT, Moran CG. Age-specific incidence of first and second fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92: 258-61.
  9. Chapurlat RD, Bauer DC, Nevitt M, Stone K, Cummings SR. Incidence and risk factors for a second hip fracture in elderly women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. Osteoporos Int 2003; 14: 130-6.
  10. Li L, Roddam A, Gitlin M et al. Persistence with osteoporosis medications among postmenopausal women in the UK General Practice Research Database. Menopause 2012; 19: 33-40.
  11. Curtis JR, Arora T, Matthews RS et al. Is withholding osteopor- osis medication after fracture sometimes rational? A compari- son of the risk for second fracture versus death. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2010; 11: 584-91.
  12. Gibson-Smith D, Klop C, Elders PJM et al. The risk of major and any (non-hip) fragility fracture after hip fracture in the United Kingdom: 2000-2010. Osteoporos Int 2014; 25: 2555-63.
  13. McLellan AR, Wolowacz SE, Zimovetz EA et al. Fracture liaison services for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture: a cost-effectiveness evaluation based on data collected over 8 years of service provision. Osteoporos Int 2011; 22: 2083-98.
  14. Majumdar SR, Beaupre LA, Harley CH et al. Use of a case manager to improve osteoporosis treatment after hip fracture -results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 2110-5.
  15. Lih A, Nandapalan H, Kim M et al. Targeted intervention reduces refracture rates in patients with incident non-vertebral osteoporotic fractures: a 4-year prospective controlled study. Osteoporos Int 2011; 22: 849-58. References
  16. Munro NC, McIntosh S, Lawson J et al. Incidence of complica- tions after carotid sinus massage in older patients with syncope. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994; 42: 1248-51.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ungar, A., Rivasi, G., Rafanelli, M., Toffanello, G., Mussi, C., Ceccofiglio, A., McDonagh, R., Drumm, B., Marchionni, N., Alboni, P., & Kenny, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT)
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Ungar, Andrea
Venue
Age and Ageing
Published
2016-01-31
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
242-248
ISSN
  • 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2834
OpenAlex
W2304280422
Cited by
35
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Age and Ageing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
tilt table test, carotid sinus massage, syncope, octogenarians, elderly patients, diagnostic safety, tolerability, orthostatic hypotension, orthostatic intolerance, procedural complications, transient loss of consciousness
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carotid Sinus, Female, Health Services for the Aged, Health Services Research, Humans, Ireland, Italy, Male, Massage, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Syncope, Geriatric Assessment, Tilt-Table Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review