Cited by 249Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersVestibular and auditory disordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Value of head-up tilt testing potentiated with sublingual nitroglycerin to assess the origin of unexplained syncope

Raviele, Antonio, Menozzi, Carlo, Brignole, Michele, Gasparini, Gianni, Alboni, Paolo, Musso, Giacomo, Lolli, Gino, Oddone, Daniele +2 more·1995·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

This study was undertaken to assess the value of sublingual nitroglycerin administration during upright tilt as a simple practical test for the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope. To this purpose, 235 patients with syncope of unknown origin and no evidence of organic heart disease (110 men, mean age 52 +/- 20 years) and 35 asymptomatic control subjects underwent head-up tilt testing with nitroglycerin challenge. Patients and subjects were tilted at 60 degrees for 45 + 20 minutes; the initial 45 minutes were without medication and the final 20 minutes after 300 micrograms of sublingual nitroglycerin. During the drug-free phase of the test, 59 patients (25%) and no controls had a positive response. After drug administration, a positive response (syncope in association with sudden hypotension and bradycardia) occurred in 60 patients (26%) and in 2 controls (6%), whereas an exaggerated or false-positive response (minor or different symptoms in association with slowly increasing hypotension alone) was observed in 33 patients (14%) and in 5 controls (14%). We conclude that the sublingual nitroglycerin head-up tilt test is a useful tool to unmask the vasovagal origin of unexplained syncope in patients without organic heart disease. The addition of nitroglycerin to upright tilt allows the positive rate of passive tilting to be doubled (51% vs 25%) while maintaining a high specificity (94% vs 100%).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80079-4

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tilt testing was positive in 51-56% of patients with atypical clinical features suggesting a reflex mechanism.

    “Indeed, tilt testing was positive in 51-56% of patients with atypical clinical features suggesting a reflex mechanism, 106,124-128”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raviele, A., Menozzi, C., Brignole, M., Gasparini, G., Alboni, P., Musso, G., Lolli, G., Oddone, D., Dinelli, M., & Mureddu, R.
Affiliations
Santa Maria Nuova Hospital (IT)
Corresponding author
Raviele, Antonio
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-08
Volume
76
Issue
4
Pages
267-272
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070267385
Cited by
249
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
10.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
unexplained syncope, vasovagal syncope, head-up tilt, sublingual nitroglycerin, hypotension, bradycardia, diagnostic accuracy, false positives
MeSH terms
Administration, Sublingual, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Pressure, Child, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Nitroglycerin, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Syncope, Vagus Nerve, Tilt-Table Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review