Cited by 93Obesity, Physical Activity, DietDietary Effects on HealthEating Disorders and Behaviors

Evaluation of an alternating-calorie diet with and without exercise in the treatment of obesity

Hill, J O, Schlundt, D G, Sbrocco, T, Sharp, T, Pope-Cordle, J, Stetson, B, Kaler, M, Heim, C·1989·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

This study examined the effects of calorie alternation and exercise on weight loss. Moderately obese women (130-160% of ideal body weight) were randomly assigned to an alternating- or constant-calorie diet with or without aerobic exercise. Both diets provided an average of 1200 kcal/d over a 12-wk period; daily intake of subjects in the alternating-diet condition varied in a prescribed pattern from 600 to 1800 kcal/d. Exercising subjects walked 5 d/wk. All subjects participated in an intensive outpatient behavior-modification program. At the end of the study, exercised subjects had greater reductions in body weight and body fat percentage than did nonexercised subjects. The type of caloric restriction did not affect weight or fat loss. Changes in resting metabolic rate did not differ among groups. Alternating calories was neither beneficial nor detrimental as a weight-loss strategy whereas exercise was clearly beneficial in weight-loss therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/50.2.248

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Simply alternating between different levels of energy intake (while still maintaining a degree of ER) during a dietary intervention appears to be no more effective than using a continuous fixed level of ER.

    “On the other hand, simply alternating between different levels of energy intake (while still maintaining a degree of ER) during a dietary intervention appears to be no more effective than using a continuous fixed level of ER.50, 51”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hill, J. O., Schlundt, D. G., Sbrocco, T., Sharp, T., Pope-Cordle, J., Stetson, B., Kaler, M., & Heim, C.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-08
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
248-254
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133850287
Cited by
93
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-26657)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR00095)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
caloric restriction, weight loss, obesity, aerobic exercise, body fat percentage, resting metabolic rate, behavior modification, women
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Body Composition, Body Weight, Energy Intake, Cholesterol, Energy Metabolism, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Insulin, Lipids, Middle Aged, Obesity, Triglycerides, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review