Cited by 225Dietary Effects on HealthDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

The effects of intermittent compared to continuous energy restriction on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes; a pragmatic pilot trial

Carter, S., Clifton, P.M., Keogh, J.B.·2016·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

Aims Weight loss improves glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, as achieving and maintaining weight loss is difficult, alternative strategies are needed. Our primary aim was to investigate the effects of intermittent energy restriction (IER) compared to continuous energy restriction (CER) on glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Secondary aims were to assess effects on weight loss, body composition, medication changes and subjective measures of appetite. Using a 2-day IER method, we expected equal improvements to HbA1c and weight in both groups.Method Sixty-three overweight or obese participants (BMI 35.2±5kg/m 2) with T2DM (HbA1c 7.4±1.3%) (57mmol/mol) were randomised to a 2-day severe energy restriction (1670-2500kJ/day) with 5days of habitual eating, compared to a moderate CER diet (5000-6500kJ/day) for 12weeks.Results At 12weeks HbA1c (-0.7±0.9% P<0.001) and percent body weight reduction (-5.9±4% P<0.001) was similar in both groups with no group by time interaction. Similar reductions were also seen for medication dosages, all measures of body composition and subjective reports of appetite.Conclusions In this pilot trial, 2days of IER compared with CER resulted in similar improvements in glycaemic control and weight reduction offering a suitable alternative treatment strategy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.10.010

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carter, S., Clifton, P. M., & Keogh, J. B.
Affiliations
University of South Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Clifton, P.M.
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
122
Pages
106-112
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2538540245
Cited by
225
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
intermittent energy restriction, continuous energy restriction, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, weight loss, body composition, appetite, diabetes medication reduction, dietary intervention
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Body Composition, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Energy Metabolism, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Pilot Projects, Weight Loss, Caloric Restriction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review