Cited by 130Physical Activity and HealthBehavioral Health and InterventionsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

The relationship between self-monitoring, outcome expectancies, difficulties with eating and exercise, and physical activity and weight loss treatment outcomes

Carels, Robert A., Darby, Lynn A., Rydin, Sofia, Douglass, Olivia M., Cacciapaglia, Holly M., O'Brien, William H.·2005·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: During a behavioral weight loss program (BWLP), weight loss and exercise can vary considerably from week to week. Weekly fluctuations in outcome expectancies and perceived difficulties with eating and exercise may be associated with weekly variability in weight loss and exercise. Also, inconsistent self-monitoring of exercise may be associated with poor weight loss and physical activity treatment outcomes. METHODS: Forty obese, sedentary participants completed a 6-month BWLP. Body weight, outcome expectancies, and difficulties with eating and exercise were assessed weekly. Weekly self-monitoring of exercise was computed from physical activity diaries. Physical activity, VO2max, and caloric intake were assessed pre- and posttreatment. RESULTS: Within-subjects analyses indicated that participants exercised less during weeks that participants reported greater difficulties with exercise, relative to weeks participants reported fewer difficulties. Participants lost significantly more weight during weeks that participants reported more positive outcome expectancies and greater difficulties with exercise, compared to weeks participants reported less positive outcome expectancies and fewer difficulties with exercise. Consistent self-monitoring of exercise was associated with fewer difficulties with exercise and greater exercise and weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions that are targeted to increase self-monitoring and to improve transient difficulties with exercise and diminished outcome expectancies may improve BWLP treatment outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15324796abm3003_2

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only one reviewed study specifically examined the role of self-monitoring exercise in relation to weight loss.

    “However, only one of these studies specifically examined the role of self-monitoring exercise in relation to weight loss (27).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [9]9. Perri MG, Fuller PR: Success and failure in the treatment of obesity: Where do we go from here? Medicine, Exercise, Nutri- tion, and Health. 1995, 4:255-272.
  2. [12]12. Bandura A: Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social-Cognitive Framework. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986.
  3. [16]16. Godin G, Valois P, Jobin J, Ross A: Prediction of intention to exercise of individuals who have suffered from coronary heart disease. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1991, 47:762-771.
  4. [35]35. Dubbert PM, Wilson GT: Treatment failure in behavior ther- apy for obesity. In Foa E, Emmelkamp PMG (eds), Treatment Failure in Behavior Therapy. New York: Wiley, 1983, 127-153.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carels, R. A., Darby, L. A., Rydin, S., Douglass, O. M., Cacciapaglia, H. M., & O'Brien, W. H.
Affiliations
  • Bowling Green State University (US)
  • Bowling Green State University, USA
Corresponding author
Carels, Robert A.
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2005-12-01
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
182-190
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W1987894809
Cited by
129
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD050959)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
self-monitoring, outcome expectations, eating difficulties, exercise difficulty, physical activity, weight loss, behavioral weight loss program, obesity, sedentary adults, exercise adherence, physical activity diary
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Diet, Reducing, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Obesity, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Self Care, Exercise, Glycemic Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review