Cited by 282Body Composition Measurement TechniquesSports Performance and TrainingBone health and osteoporosis research

Reference Values for Body Composition and Anthropometric Measurements in Athletes

Open access
Santos, Diana A., Dawson, John A., Matias, Catarina N., Rocha, Paulo M., Minderico, Cláudia S., Allison, David B., Sardinha, Luís B., Silva, Analiza M.·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of body composition in athletes, reference sex- and sport-specific body composition data are lacking. We aim to develop reference values for body composition and anthropometric measurements in athletes. METHODS: Body weight and height were measured in 898 athletes (264 female, 634 male), anthropometric variables were assessed in 798 athletes (240 female and 558 male), and in 481 athletes (142 female and 339 male) with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). A total of 21 different sports were represented. Reference percentiles (5th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 95th) were calculated for each measured value, stratified by sex and sport. Because sample sizes within a sport were often very low for some outcomes, the percentiles were estimated using a parametric, empirical Bayesian framework that allowed sharing information across sports. RESULTS: We derived sex- and sport-specific reference percentiles for the following DXA outcomes: total (whole body scan) and regional (subtotal, trunk, and appendicular) bone mineral content, bone mineral density, absolute and percentage fat mass, fat-free mass, and lean soft tissue. Additionally, we derived reference percentiles for height-normalized indexes by dividing fat mass, fat-free mass, and appendicular lean soft tissue by height squared. We also derived sex- and sport-specific reference percentiles for the following anthropometry outcomes: weight, height, body mass index, sum of skinfold thicknesses (7 skinfolds, appendicular skinfolds, trunk skinfolds, arm skinfolds, and leg skinfolds), circumferences (hip, arm, midthigh, calf, and abdominal circumferences), and muscle circumferences (arm, thigh, and calf muscle circumferences). CONCLUSIONS: These reference percentiles will be a helpful tool for sports professionals, in both clinical and field settings, for body composition assessment in athletes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0097846

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Soccer players present different bioelectrical characteristics compared to other athletes.

    “As result of these peculiarities, recent studies [24, 27] have shown that soccer players present different bioelectrical characteristics compared to other athletes [28] and this could make it necessary to develop dedicated predictive equations.”

    From Athletic bioimpedance-based equations underestimate fat free mass components in male elite soccer players: development and validation of new soccer-specific predictive models (2023) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Results tables (page not available) compare soccer players with athletes in other sports on body-composition and anthropometric measures. The Methods list weight, height, anthropometry and DXA, but the passages found when searching for bioelectrical impedance, resistance, reactance and phase angle do not address whether soccer players differ in bioelectrical characteristics. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [36]Marfell-Jones MJ (2001) The value of the skinfold - background, assumptions, cautions, and recommendations on taking and interpreting skinfold measurements. Proceedings of the Seoul International Sport Science Congress: 313–323.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Santos, D. A., Dawson, J. A., Matias, C. N., Rocha, P. M., Minderico, C. S., Allison, D. B., Sardinha, L. B., & Silva, A. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Silva, Analiza M.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-05-15
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
e97846
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990455314
Cited by
282
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PTDC/DES/098963/2008, SFRH/BD/46503/2008)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL072757)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK056336, P30DK079626)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
Keywords
body composition, reference percentiles, athletes, anthropometry, bone mineral content, bone mineral density, fat mass, fat-free mass, lean tissue, skinfold thickness, muscle circumference, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Body Composition, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Absorptiometry, Photon, Young Adult, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review