Cited by 10Body Composition Measurement TechniquesElectrical and Bioimpedance TomographyNutrition and Health in Aging

Development and validation of bioelectrical impedance prediction equations estimating regional lean soft tissue mass in middle-aged adults

Sardinha, Luís B., Rosa, Gil B., Hetherington-Rauth, Megan, Correia, Inês R., Magalhães, João P., Silva, Analiza M., Lukaski, Henry·2023·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background/objectives Bioelectrical impedance (BIA) whole-body and regional raw parameters have been used to develop prediction models to estimate whole-body lean soft tissue (LSTM), with less attention being given to the development of models for regional LSTM. Therefore, we aimed to develop and validate BIA-derived equations predicting regional LSTM against dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in healthy adults.Subjects/methods 149 adults were included in this cross-sectional investigation. Whole-body and regional LSTM were assessed by DXA, and raw bioelectrical parameters of distinct body regions were measured using a 50 kHz phase sensitive BIA analyzer. BIA-derived equations were developed using a stepwise multiple linear regression approach in 2/3 of the sample and cross-validated in the remaining sample.Results Slopes and intercepts of predicted LSTM and DXA measured LSTM did not differ from 1 and 0, respectively, for each region (p ≥ 0.05), with the exception for the trunk (p < 0.05). The BIA-derived equations exhibited a strong relationship (p < 0.001) between the predicted and measured LSTM for each of the following body regions: right and left arms (R = 0.94; R = 0.96), right and left legs (R = 0.88; R = 0.88), upper body (R = 0.96), lower body (R = 0.89), right and left sides of the body (R = 0.94; R = 0.94), and trunk (R = 0.90). Agreement analyses revealed no associations between the differences and the means of the predicted and DXA-derived LSTM.Conclusion The developed BIA-derived equations provide a valid estimate of regional LSTM in middle-aged healthy adults, representing a cost-effective and time-efficient alternative to DXA for the assessment and identification of LSTM imbalances in both clinical and sport-specific contexts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41430-022-01224-0

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sardinha, L. B., Rosa, G. B., Hetherington-Rauth, M., Correia, I. R., Magalhães, J. P., Silva, A. M., & Lukaski, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • University of North Dakota (US)
Corresponding author
Sardinha, Luís B.
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2022-10-17
Volume
77
Issue
2
Pages
202-211
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W4306409866
Cited by
10
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
bioimpedance, prediction equations, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, middle-aged adults, body composition assessment, trunk lean mass
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Composition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Reproducibility of Results, Absorptiometry, Photon, Linear Models, Electric Impedance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review