Cited by 174Nutritional Studies and DietFood composition and propertiesGut microbiota and health

Whole-grain consumption is associated with a reduced risk of noncardiovascular, noncancer death attributed to inflammatory diseases in the Iowa Women's Health Study

Open access
Jacobs, David R, Andersen, Lene Frost, Blomhoff, Rune·2007·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background It has recently been shown that oxidative stress, infection, and inflammation are predominant pathophysiologic factors for several major diseases. Objective We investigated the association of whole-grain intake with death attributed to noncardiovascular, noncancer inflammatory diseases. Design Postmenopausal women (n = 41 836) aged 55-69 y at baseline in 1986 were followed for 17 y. After exclusions for cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, colitis, and liver cirrhosis at baseline, 27 312 participants remained, of whom 5552 died during the 17 y. A proportional hazards regression model was adjusted for age, smoking, adiposity, education, physical activity, and other dietary factors. Results Inflammation-related death was inversely associated with whole-grain intake. Compared with the hazard ratios in women who rarely or never ate whole-grain foods, the hazard ratio was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.57, 0.83) for those who consumed 4-7 servings/wk, 0.79 (0.66, 0.95) for 7.5-10.5 servings/wk, 0.64 (0.53, 0.79) for 11-18.5 servings/wk, and 0.66 (0.54, 0.81) for >or=19 servings/wk (P for trend = 0.01). Previously reported inverse associations of whole-grain intake with total and coronary heart disease mortality persisted after 17 y of follow-up. Conclusions The reduction in inflammatory mortality associated with habitual whole-grain intake was larger than that previously reported for coronary heart disease and diabetes. Because a variety of phytochemicals are found in whole grain…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/85.6.1606

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacobs, D. R., Andersen, L. F., & Blomhoff, R.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Jacobs, David R
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-06
Volume
85
Issue
6
Pages
1606-1614
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113080165
Cited by
174
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01 CA39742, R01CA039742)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
whole grain intake, non-cardiovascular mortality, non-cancer mortality, oxidative stress, postmenopausal women, dietary intake, phytochemicals, inflammation
MeSH terms
Aged, Antioxidants, Cardiovascular Diseases, Edible Grain, Diet, Dietary Fiber, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Middle Aged, Mortality, Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Risk, Proportional Hazards Models, Postmenopause, Oxidative Stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review