The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Current protein intake in America: analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003–2004
Open accessAbstract
In recent years there has been considerable interest in the benefits of high-protein diets. This study determined current usual intake of protein in America. Using the most recent data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003-2004, usual protein intake for Americans aged 2+ years was estimated. Usual protein intake was calculated on a grams per day, grams per kilogram ideal body weight, and a percentage of calories basis. Protein intake averaged 56 +/- 14 g/d in young children, increased to a high of approximately 91 +/- 22 g/d in adults aged 19-30 y, and decreased to approximately 66 +/- 17 g/d in the elderly. The percentage of the male population who consumed less than the estimated average requirement was very low. Our estimates indicated that 7.7% of adolescent females and 7.2-8.6% of older adult women reported consuming protein levels below their estimated average requirement. The median intake of protein on a percentage of calories basis ranged from 13.4% in children aged 4-8 y to 16.0% in men aged 51-70 y. Even the 95th percentile of protein intake did not approach the highest acceptable macronutrient distribution range of 35% for an age/sex group. The highest 95th percentile of protein intake was 20.8% of calories in men aged 51-70 y. Given the demonstrated benefits of higher protein intake on weight management, sarcopenia, and other physiologic functions, efforts should be undertaken to ensure that Americans consume the recommended amount of protein (17-21% of calories as expected from MyPyramid food patterns).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“although younger individuals consume protein above the RDA (1.3 g kg -1 day -1 ; Fulgoni, 2008)”
From Sex‐based differences in endurance exercise muscle metabolism: impact on exercise and nutritional strategies to optimize health and performance in women (2016) · cites this paper as Fulgoni, 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–307 of 307
Consumo alimentar e metabolismo mineral e ósseo em mulheres idosas com sarcopenia
Genaro, P. D. S. (2010) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.6.2010.tde-24052010-095200
Metabolic Consequences of Egg White versus Wheat Gluten Protein Consumption in a Rodent Model
Du, K., Markus, E., Fecych, M., Lee Beverly, J., Rhodes, J. S., & Rendeiro, C. (2019) · Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences · doi:10.35248/2155-9600.19.9.761
“A protein level of 20% is more typical in individuals trying to maintain a high-protein diet [40].”
BackgroundInfluentialHealthy Foods for Healthy Aging
Kubena, K. S., & McIntosh, W. A. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-805376-8.00029-0
Effects of Long Term Consumption of Animal Proteins in the High Calorie Diet
Farooqui, A. A. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15254-7_4 · Cited by 1
Nutrition in the Second Half of Life
Chernoff, R. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-801238-3.00238-5
Dietary Protein Intake, Body Composition and Self-Reported Physical Functioning in U.S. Adults
Parker, K. (2010) · doi:10.15368/theses.2010.155
“While protein malnutrition is not considered prevalent in America, there is evidence that points to a decrease in intake of this macromolecule as people age, if for no other reason than a shift with age to a relatively lower total energy intake (Fulgoni 2008).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Fulgoni, V. L.
- Affiliations
- Canadian Nutrition Society (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Fulgoni, Victor L
- ORCID
- Fulgoni, Victor L
- Venue
- The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1554S-1557S
- ISSN
- 0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1924042297
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 5.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
- Keywords
- protein intake, usual dietary intake, protein adequacy, estimated average requirement, age and sex differences, adolescents, older adults, children, high-protein diet
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Body Weight, Child, Child, Preschool, Dietary Proteins, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Nutrition Surveys, Nutritional Requirements, United States, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Muscle, Skeletal, Nutrition Policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review