Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,982

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes

Open access
Moshfegh, Alanna J, Rhodes, Donna G, Baer, David J, Murayi, Theophile, Clemens, John C, Rumpler, William V, Paul, David R, Sebastian, Rhonda S, Kuczynski, Kevin J, Ingwersen, Linda A, Staples, Robert C, Cleveland, Linda E·2008·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
DOI 10.1093/ajcn/88.2.324
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/88.2.324

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Raper, 2004, An overview of USDA's dietary intake data system., J Food Compos Anal, 17, 545, 10.1016/j.jfca.2004.02.013 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Moshfegh, 2001, Research results using the new USDA Automated Multiple-Pass Method., FASEB J, 15, A278
  3. Conway, 2003, Effectiveness of the US Department of Agriculture 5-step multiple-pass method in assessing food intake in obese and nonobese women., Am J Clin Nutr, 77, 1171, 10.1093/ajcn/77.5.1171 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Conway, 2004, Accuracy of dietary recall using the USDA five-step multiple-pass method in men: an observational validation study., J Am Diet Assoc, 104, 595, 10.1016/j.jada.2004.01.007 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Subar, 2003, Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: the OPEN study., Am J Epidemiol, 158, 1, 10.1093/aje/kwg092 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Dwyer, 2003, Future directions for the integrated CSFII-NHANES: What We Eat in America-NHANES., J Nutr, 133, 576S, 10.1093/jn/133.2.576S · DOI
  7. Trabulsi, 2001, Evaluation of dietary assessment instruments against doubly labeled water, a biomarker of habitual energy intake., Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, 281, E891, 10.1152/ajpendo.2001.281.5.E891 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Mertz, 1992, Food intake measurements: is there a “gold standard”?, J Am Diet Assoc, 92, 1463, 10.1016/S0002-8223(21)00927-5 · DOI
  9. Rumpler, 2008, Identifying sources of reporting error using measured food intake., Eur J Clin Nutr, 62, 544, 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602742 · DOI
  10. Blanton, 2006, The USDA Automated Multiple-Pass Method accurately estimates group total energy and nutrient intake., J Nutr, 136, 2594, 10.1093/jn/136.10.2594 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Livingstone, 2003, Markers of the validity of reported energy intake., J Nutr, 133, 895S, 10.1093/jn/133.3.895S · DOI · Paper page
  12. Schoeller, 1999, Recent advances from application of doubly labeled water to measurement of human energy expenditure., J Nutr, 129, 1765, 10.1093/jn/129.10.1765 · DOI
  13. McBride, 2001, Was it a slab, a slice, or a sliver? High-tech innovations take food survey to a new level., Agric Res, 49, 4
  14. Anand, 2006, Quality assurance during data processing of food and nutrient intakes., J Food Compos Anal, 19, S86, 10.1016/j.jfca.2006.02.005 · DOI
  15. Racette, 1994, Relative dilution spaces of 2H- and 18O-labeled water in humans., Am J Physiol, 267, E585
  16. Weber, 2001, Validity of self-reported energy intake in lean and obese young women, using two nutrient databases, compared with total energy expenditure assessed by doubly labeled water., Eur J Clin Nutr, 55, 940, 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601249 · DOI
  17. Seale, 1993, Seven-day validation of doubly labeled water method using indirect calorimetry., J Appl Physiol, 74, 402, 10.1152/jappl.1993.74.1.402 · DOI
  18. Howe, 1993, Energy expenditure by indirect calorimetry in premenopausal women: variation within one menstrual cycle., J Nutr Biochem, 4, 268, 10.1016/0955-2863(93)90096-F · DOI · Paper page
  19. de Weir, 1949, New methods for calculating metabolic rate with reference to protein metabolism., J Physiol, 109, 1, 10.1113/jphysiol.1949.sp004363 · DOI
  20. Paul, 2005, Validation of a food frequency questionnaire by direct measurement of habitual ad libitum intake., Am J Epidemiol, 162, 806, 10.1093/aje/kwi279 · DOI
  21. Rhodes DG, Cleveland LE, Murayi T, Moshfegh AJ. The effect of weekend eating on nutrient intakes and dietary patterns. FASEB J21(6):A1064 (abstr). · DOI
  22. Tran, 2000, In-person vs telephone-administered multiple-pass 24-hour recalls in women: validation with doubly labeled water., J Am Diet Assoc, 100, 777, 10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00227-3 · DOI
  23. Casey, 1999, The use of telephone interview methodology to obtain 24-hour dietary recalls., J Amer Diet Assoc, 99, 1406, 10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00340-5 · DOI
  24. Sawaya, 1996, Evaluation of four methods for determining energy intake in young and older women: comparison with doubly labeled water measurements of total energy expenditure., Am J Clin Nutr, 63, 491, 10.1093/ajcn/63.4.491 · DOI · Paper page
  25. de Jonge, 2007, Validation study of energy expenditure and intake during calorie restriction using doubly labeled water and changes in body composition., Am J Clin Nutr, 85, 73, 10.1093/ajcn/85.1.73 · DOI
  26. Basiotis, 1987, Number of days of food intake records required to estimate individual and group nutrient intakes with defined confidence., J Nutr, 117, 1638, 10.1093/jn/117.9.1638 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Johnson, 1998, Matthews DE. Literacy and body fatness are associated with underreporting of energy intake in US low-income women using the multiple-pass 24-hour recall: a doubly labeled water study., J Am Diet Assoc, 98, 1136, 10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00263-6 · DOI
  28. Goldberg, 1991, Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology. 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-recording., Eur J Clin Nutr, 45, 569
  29. Briefel, 1997, Dietary methods research in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: underreporting of energy intake., Am J Clin Nutr, 65, 1203S, 10.1093/ajcn/65.4.1203S · DOI · Paper page
  30. Tooze, 2004, Psychosocial predictors of energy underreporting in a large doubly labeled water study., Am J Clin Nutr, 79, 795, 10.1093/ajcn/79.5.795 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Krebs-Smith, 2000, Low energy reporters vs others: a comparison of reported food intakes., Eur J Clin Nutr, 54, 281, 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600936 · DOI
  32. Ward, 2007, Adiposity, education and weight loss effort are independently associated with energy reporting quality in the Ontario Food Survey., Public Health Nutr, 10, 803, 10.1017/S1368980007258598 · DOI
  33. Goris, 2000, Undereating and underrecording of habitual food intake in obese men: selective underreporting of fat intake., Am J Clin Nutr, 71, 130, 10.1093/ajcn/71.1.130 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Prentice, 1986, High levels of energy expenditure in obese women., Br Med J, 292, 983, 10.1136/bmj.292.6526.983 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,982

Metadata

Authors
Moshfegh, A. J., Rhodes, D. G., Baer, D. J., Murayi, T., Clemens, J. C., Rumpler, W. V., Paul, D. R., Sebastian, R. S., Kuczynski, K. J., Ingwersen, L. A., Staples, R. C., & Cleveland, L. E.
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
88
Issue
2
Pages
324-332
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1093/ajcn/88.2.324
OpenAlex
W2141884714
Cited by
1,982
References
3
FWCI
23.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.