The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sense of Coherence and Mortality in Men and Women in the EPIC-Norfolk United Kingdom Prospective Cohort Study
Abstract
This study tested the hypothesis that a personality disposition defined by a strong sense of coherence is associated with a reduced risk of mortality. The authors prospectively examined, for < or =6 years, the relation between a strong sense of coherence and mortality due to all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer among 20,579 participants aged 41-80 years from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC)-Norfolk Study in the United Kingdom. Data were collected in 1996-2002. Participants were recruited by post from general practice age-sex registers and subsequently completed a postal assessment of their sense of coherence. During follow-up, 1,024 deaths were recorded. A strong sense of coherence was associated with a 30% reduction in mortality from all causes (rate ratio=0.69, p<0.0001), cardiovascular disease (rate ratio=0.70, p=0.001), and cancer (rate ratio=0.74, p=0.003), independent of age, sex, and prevalent chronic disease. These associations were consistent by sex, except that no association was observed for cancer mortality in women. The association for all-cause mortality remained after adjustment for cigarette smoking history, social class, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, cholesterol, hostility, and neuroticism (rate ratio=0.76, p=0.002). Results suggest that a strong sense of coherence may confer some resilience to the risk of chronic disease.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In this UK cohort, the same pattern of findings emerged for those with low sense of coherence, although this trait was a risk for cancer mortality only in men [128].”
From Personality and Longevity: Knowns, Unknowns, and Implications for Public Health and Personalized Medicine (2011) · cites this paper as [128]
In the citing paper
“and for CVD mortality over 11 years, particularly in persons with low CVD risk [127, 128]”
From Personality and Longevity: Knowns, Unknowns, and Implications for Public Health and Personalized Medicine (2011) · cites this paper as [128]
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Positive Psychology
(2001) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195135336.001.0001 · Cited by 9,158
The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale
Antonovsky, A. (1993) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(93)90033-z · Cited by 3,515
A revised version of the Psychoticism scale
Eysenck, S. B. G., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1 · Cited by 3,094
Rozanski, A., Blumenthal, J. A., & Kaplan, J. (1999) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.99.16.2192 · Cited by 2,846
The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds
Albrecht, G. L., & DEVLIEGER, P. J. (1999) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00411-0 · Cited by 2,146
Unraveling the mystery of health
Antonovsky, A. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,967
McEWEN, B. S., & SEEMAN, T. (1999) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08103.x · Cited by 1,824
Allostatic load as a marker of cumulative biological risk: MacArthur studies of successful aging
Seeman, T. E., McEwen, B. S., Rowe, J. W., & Singer, B. H. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.081072698 · Cited by 1,385
Seeman, T. E. (1997) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1997.00440400111013 · Cited by 1,368
(2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315167534 · Cited by 1,147
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x · Cited by 2,361
Validity of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale: a systematic review
Eriksson, M., & Lindström, B. (2005) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2003.018085 · Cited by 1,542
Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale and the relation with health: a systematic review
Eriksson, M., & Lindström, B. (2006) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2005.041616 · Cited by 1,477
Jia, K., Chen, D., & Riddle, D. L. (2004) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.01255 · Cited by 615
Seiler, A., & Jenewein, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00208 · Cited by 558
Metadata
- Authors
- Surtees, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Surtees, P.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-12-15
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1202-1209
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101075322
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 25.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Keywords
- sense of coherence, mortality, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, cancer mortality, personality, sex differences, EPIC-Norfolk cohort, chronic disease risk, resilience
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Attitude, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Personality, Prospective Studies, Cohort Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
