Cited by 96Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesObesity and Health Practices

Association Between Perceived Interpersonal Everyday Discrimination and Waist Circumference Over a 9-Year Period in the Midlife Development in the United States Cohort Study

Open access
Hunte, H. E. R.·2011·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

The relation between perceived interpersonal experiences of discrimination and measures of obesity is of great interest to many. This study examined the relation between changes in waist circumference and changes in perceived interpersonal everyday discrimination using the 1995-2004 Midlife Development in the United States cohort study (N = 1,452). After controlling for potential confounding variables that assessed behavioral and sociodemographic characteristics, sex-stratified ordinary least squares regression analyses suggested that the waist circumference of adult males who reported consistently high levels of interpersonal everyday discrimination increased 2.39 cm more than that of adult males who consistently reported low levels of interpersonal everyday discrimination (P < 0.05). Similarly, the waist circumference of adult females who reported an increase in interpersonal everyday discrimination increased 1.88 cm more than that of adult females who reported consistently low levels of interpersonal everyday discrimination (P < 0.05). These findings suggest that perceived interpersonal everyday discrimination may be associated with an increase in waist circumference over time among adults in the United States.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwq463

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For physical health, only overweight-related outcomes and a range of miscellaneous physical health outcomes were significantly associated with racism.

    “With regard to physical health, only overweight-related outcomes and a range of miscellaneous physical health outcomes were significantly associated with racism, as found in recent longitudinal studies [399, 400].”

    From Racism as a Determinant of Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2015) · cites this paper as [400]

    The Abstract reports a significant association between interpersonal everyday discrimination and increased waist circumference over nine years, supporting the overweight-related part of the claim. The paper studies waist circumference, not a range of other physical health outcomes, and its measure of discrimination is not limited to racism. It therefore cannot establish the claim’s broader ‘only’ comparison. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [31]Brim OG, Bates PB, Bumpass LL, et al. National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States 1995-6. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. [32]Ryff CD, Almeida DM, Ayanian JS, et al. Midlife Development in the United States (MIDUS II), 2004-2006. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  3. [36]StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: release 10: College Station, TX, StataCorp LP; 2007. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hunte, H. E. R.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Hunte, H. E. R.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2011-02-25
Volume
173
Issue
11
Pages
1232-1239
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2163072695
Cited by
96
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 11
FWCI
26.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University Libraries (University of Maryland) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park)
Funders
  • Purdue University
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG020166)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
perceived discrimination, interpersonal discrimination, waist circumference, abdominal obesity, middle-aged adults, longitudinal change, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prejudice, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress, Psychological, United States, Cohort Studies, Health Behavior, Body Mass Index, Waist Circumference, Obesity, Abdominal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review