Cited by 417Diet and metabolism studiesDietary Effects on HealthNutritional Studies and Diet

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 1 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Effects of Low-Carbohydrate Diets Versus Low-Fat Diets on Metabolic Risk Factors: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials

Open access

Abstract

The effects of low-carbohydrate diets (≤45% of energy from carbohydrates) versus low-fat diets (≤30% of energy from fat) on metabolic risk factors were compared in a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Twenty-three trials from multiple countries with a total of 2,788 participants met the predetermined eligibility criteria (from January 1, 1966 to June 20, 2011) and were included in the analyses. Data abstraction was conducted in duplicate by independent investigators. Both low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets lowered weight and improved metabolic risk factors. Compared with participants on low-fat diets, persons on low-carbohydrate diets experienced a slightly but statistically significantly lower reduction in total cholesterol (2.7 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval: 0.8, 4.6), and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (3.7 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval: 1.0, 6.4), but a greater increase in high density lipoprotein cholesterol (3.3 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval: 1.9, 4.7) and a greater decrease in triglycerides (-14.0 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval: -19.4, -8.7). Reductions in body weight, waist circumference and other metabolic risk factors were not significantly different between the 2 diets. These findings suggest that low-carbohydrate diets are at least as effective as low-fat diets at reducing weight and improving metabolic risk factors. Low-carbohydrate diets could be recommended to obese persons with abnormal metabolic risk factors for the purpose of weight loss. Studies demonstrating long-term effects of low-carbohydrate diets on cardiovascular events were warranted.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kws264

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 1 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 61 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 20
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 11
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 6
34 of 34
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many clinical trials of low-carbohydrate diets have small sample sizes and insufficient statistical power to detect small changes in metabolic risk factors that may have public health importance.

    “Many clinical trials of lowcarbohydrate diets have small sample sizes and insufficient statistical power to detect small changes in metabolic risk factors that may have public health importance.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Low-carbohydrate diets may include significant amounts of fat and cholesterol, which have been associated with elevated LDL cholesterol levels, raising concern about adverse effects on metabolic risk factors.

    “Because lowcarbohydrate diets may include significant amounts of fat and cholesterol, which have been associated with elevated low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, there is concern about their adverse effects on metabolic risk factors.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Insulin estimate is not centered in its confidence interval

    Minor

    For the healthy-participant sensitivity analysis, the reported insulin net change is −0.3, whereas the midpoint of its stated 95% confidence interval is −0.1. That difference exceeds rounding to one decimal place for the symmetric confidence intervals described in the methods.

    Reported -0.3 · recomputed -0.1

  • Duration subgroup changes from at least to more than one year

    Minor

    The methods define the longer-duration subgroup as interventions lasting at least 12 months, which includes exactly one year. The results describe that subgroup as lasting more than one year, which excludes those trials.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 51 references

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 416

Metadata

Authors
Hu, T., Mills, K. T., Yao, L., Demanelis, K., Eloustaz, M., Yancy, W. S., Kelly, T. N., He, J., & Bazzano, L. A.
Affiliations
Tulane University (US)
Corresponding author
Bazzano, Lydia A.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2012-10-01
Volume
176
Issue
suppl_7
Pages
S44-S54
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2135997989
Cited by
417
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 20
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Tulane University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • School of Medicine, Duke University
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K08HL091108)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
low-carbohydrate diet, low-fat diet, metabolic risk factors, weight loss, obesity, cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, waist circumference, dietary fat restriction
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Body Weight, Cholesterol, Female, Humans, Insulin, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Triglycerides, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Diet, Fat-Restricted, Metabolic Syndrome, Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted, Waist Circumference, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review