Cited by 54Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyReproductive Health and Technologies

History of infertility and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective analysis of 40,773 pregnancies

Open access
Tobias, D. K., Chavarro, J. E., Williams, M. A., Buck Louis, G. M., Hu, F. B., Rich-Edwards, J., Missmer, S. A., Zhang, C.·2013·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Studies of delayed conception and risk of gestational diabetes (GDM) are sparse, although common underlying mechanisms are plausible, including insulin resistance and inflammation. The association between a history of infertility and GDM was assessed prospectively among 40,773 eligible pregnancies in the US Nurses' Health Study II cohort (1989-2001). Biennial questionnaires provided updated information on infertility and several lifestyle and health-related characteristics. Multivariable log-binomial models with generalized estimating equations were used to compute risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals, adjusting for age, prepregnancy body mass index (weight (kg)/height (m)(2)), and additional potential confounders. GDM occurred among 1,405 (5.2%) women. A prepregnancy history of infertility was reported by 5,497 (20.5%) participants and was significantly associated with a 39% greater risk of GDM (risk ratio (RR) = 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.24, 1.57; P < 0.001). Underlying reasons for infertility associated with GDM included ovulation disorders (RR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.23, 1.87; P < 0.001) and tubal blockage (RR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.20, 2.77; P = 0.005). The association of cervical mucus disorder with GDM was of borderline significance (RR = 1.70, 95% CI: 0.88, 3.30; P = 0.11). Endometriosis (RR = 1.27, 95% CI: 0.70, 2.31; P = 0.43) and male factor infertility (RR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.78, 1.61; P = 0.55) were not associated with GDM risk. These novel findings suggest that infertility, particularly from ovulation disorders and tubal blockage, is associated with an increased GDM risk. Further research is needed to identify mechanisms or common underlying metabolic dysfunction explaining these observations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwt110

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Infertility due to tubal disease has been positively associated with risk of gestational diabetes.

    “In addition, we have previously found positive associations between infertility due to tubal disease and risk of other cardio-metabolic conditions including gestational diabetes (24) and type 2 diabetes (Tobias, under review for publication).”

    From Infertility, fertility treatment, and risk of hypertension (2015) · cites this paper as [24]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Willett W. Nutritional Epidemiology. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tobias, D. K., Chavarro, J. E., Williams, M. A., Buck Louis, G. M., Hu, F. B., Rich-Edwards, J., Missmer, S. A., & Zhang, C.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Tobias, D. K.
  • Zhang, C.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2013-08-15
Volume
178
Issue
8
Pages
1219-1225
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2138956810
Cited by
54
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Diabetes Association (7‐12‐MN‐34)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • National Institutes of Health (HHSN275201000020C, DK46200)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (HSN275201000020C)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA50385, R01CA050385)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK058845, P30DK046200, P30 DK46200-18, DK58845)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN275201000020C, CA50385)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (# HHSN275201000020C)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
infertility, gestational diabetes mellitus, ovulatory dysfunction, tubal occlusion, endometriosis, male factor infertility, pre-pregnancy body mass index, insulin resistance, inflammation, Nurses' Health Study II
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Infertility, Female, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Odds Ratio, Diabetes, Gestational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review