The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Age at Menarche and Risks of All-Cause and Cardiovascular Death: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Open accessAbstract
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the associations between menarcheal age and all-cause and cardiovascular death. Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Knowledge were searched for articles published prior to March 2013 reporting on the associations between menarcheal age and death from all causes or from cardiovascular disease (total cardiovascular disease, ischemic heart disease (IHD), and stroke) in adult women. Nine articles were eligible for inclusion; these reported 5 estimates each for death from all causes and total cardiovascular death, 6 estimates for IHD, and 7 estimates for death from stroke. Our meta-analysis showed that each 1-year increase in age at menarche was associated with a 3% lower relative risk of death from all causes (pooled hazard ratio = 0.97, 95% confidence interval: 0.96, 0.98) with low heterogeneity (I(2) = 32.2%). Meta-analysis of 2 cohorts showed a higher risk of death from all causes for women who experienced early menarche (at <12 years of age) versus "not early" menarche (at ≥ 12 years of age) (pooled hazard ratio = 1.23, 95% confidence interval: 1.10, 1.38; I(2) = 0%). An inverse association between age at menarche and death from IHD was observed only among nonsmoking populations or populations with low prevalence of smoking. We found no evidence of association between age at menarche and death from all cardiovascular diseases or stroke. Early menarche was consistently associated with higher risk of death from all causes. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of menarcheal age on cardiovascular outcomes and to investigate the potential modifying role of smoking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Family environments, adrenarche and sexual maturation: a longitudinal test of a life history model
Ellis, B. J., & Essex, M. J. (2007) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01092.x · Cited by 320
Lifetime reproductive and anthropometric risk factors for breast cancer in postmenopausal women
Velie, E. M., Nechuta, S., & Osuch, J. R. (2006) · Breast Disease · doi:10.3233/bd-2006-24103 · Cited by 120
Cited by
Okoth, K., Chandan, J. S., Marshall, T., Thangaratinam, S., Thomas, G. N., Nirantharakumar, K., & Adderley, N. J. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m3502 · Cited by 416
Effect of primary ovarian insufficiency and early natural menopause on mortality: a meta-analysis
Tao, X.-Y., Zuo, A.-Z., Wang, J.-Q., & Tao, F.-B. (2016) · Climacteric · doi:10.3109/13697137.2015.1094784 · Cited by 147
How non-nutritive sweeteners influence hormones and health
Rother, K. I., Conway, E. M., & Sylvetsky, A. C. (2018) · Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.tem.2018.04.010 · Cited by 85
Chen, X., Liu, Y., Sun, X., Yin, Z., Li, H., Liu, X., Zhang, D., Cheng, C., Liu, L., Liu, F., et al. (2019) · Menopause · doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000001289 · Cited by 68
Rosendaal, N. T. A., & Pirkle, C. M. (2017) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4519-x · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Charalampopoulos, D., McLoughlin, A., Elks, C. E., & Ong, K. K.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-06-11
- Volume
- 180
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-40
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2140016056
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.