Cited by 469Nutritional Studies and DietNutrition and Health StudiesStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Validity of a dietary questionnaire assessed by comparison with multiple weighed dietary records or 24-hour recalls

Open access
Yuan, Changzheng, Spiegelman, Donna, Rimm, Eric B., Rosner, Bernard A., Stampfer, Meir J., Barnett, Junaidah B., Chavarro, Jorge E., Subar, Amy F. +2 more·2017·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

The authors evaluated the validity of a 152-item semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (SFFQ) by comparing it with two 7-day dietary records (7DDRs) or up to 4 automated self-administered 24-hour recalls (ASA24s) over a 1-year period in the women's Lifestyle Validation Study (2010-2012), conducted among subgroups of the Nurses' Health Studies. Intakes of energy and 44 nutrients were assessed using the 3 methods among 632 US women. Compared with the 7DDRs, SFFQ responses tended to underestimate sodium intake but overestimate intakes of energy, macronutrients, and several nutrients in fruits and vegetables, such as carotenoids. Spearman correlation coefficients between energy-adjusted intakes from 7DDRs and the SFFQ completed at the end of the data-collection period ranged from 0.36 for lauric acid to 0.77 for alcohol (mean r = 0.53). Correlations of the end-period SFFQ were weaker when ASA24s were used as the comparison method (mean r = 0.43). After adjustment for within-person variation in the comparison method, the correlations of the final SFFQ were similar with 7DDRs (mean r = 0.63) and ASA24s (mean r = 0.62). These data indicate that this SFFQ provided reasonably valid estimates for intakes of a wide variety of dietary variables and that use of multiple 24-hour recalls or 7DDRs as a comparison method provided similar conclusions if day-to-day variation was taken into account.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kww104

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Perisic I, Rosner B. Comparisons of measures of interclass correlations: the general case of unequal group size. Stat Med. 1999;18(12):1451-1466.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yuan, C., Spiegelman, D., Rimm, E. B., Rosner, B. A., Stampfer, M. J., Barnett, J. B., Chavarro, J. E., Subar, A. F., Sampson, L. K., & Willett, W. C.
Corresponding author
Willett, Walter C.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2017-02-25
Volume
185
Issue
7
Pages
570-584
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2636477438
Cited by
469
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 1
FWCI
36.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UM1 CA186107, UM1 CA176726, P01 CA055075-18S1)
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
24-hour dietary recall, ASA24, within-person variability, nutrient intake estimation, sodium intake, energy intake, macronutrients, carotenoids
MeSH terms
Diet, Diet Surveys, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mental Recall, United States, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review